Article

Exploring TESOL Pedagogies in Japan: An Autoethnographic Study of Eikaiwa Teaching Practices

Dominic Bryan San Jose ORCID , Melona Guitche ORCID
    Received
    30 Apr 2025
    Published
    05 Jun 2025

    Abstract

    With eikaiwa (English conversation schools) playing a crucial role in Japan’s English education landscape, the pedagogical methods used in eikaiwa have received relatively little attention. Thus, utilizing the three-dimensional framework of temporality, sociality, and spatiality, this autoethnographic study explored and documented the teaching practices used and adopted by one of the researchers as a TESOL teacher at eikaiwa schools in Japan. The findings reveal a transition from grammar-focused instruction to student-centered, interactive approaches, influenced by communicative language teaching, task-based learning, and translanguaging strategies. It concludes that factors like social dynamics, institutional constraints, and physical environments shape teaching practices and dynamics in eikaiwa settings. These factors influence teachers to either withdraw or transition from the dominance of grammatical formalism to more student-centered, responsive, and contextualized approaches to learning, as demonstrated by the participant. Moreover, the study points out how the commercial environment in eikaiwa often leads to a conflict between educational purpose and commercial gain but believes that these types of constraints can be the ones that can also drive pedagogical innovations. Lastly, it highlights the role of spatial design in improving classroom and learning interactions that may be relevant beyond eikaiwa settings. While findings may be applicable beyond eikaiwa settings, the study acknowledges its limitations in terms of generalizability across Japan’s eikaiwa institutions. Further studies are needed to shed light on the overall circumstances of eikaiwa teachers in Japan. Implications suggest the need for greater pedagogical autonomy and professional development in private language teaching settings.

    Keywords

    Autoethnography, Teaching English in Japan, TESOL, Eikaiwa, Japan

    References
    1. [1] Zeng, J., Yang, J., 2024. English language hegemony: retrospect and prospect. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 11(1), 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02821-z
    2. [2] Abdullayeva, C.F., 2024. Cultural Consideration in Teaching English Language. European Journal of Innovation in Nonformal Education. 4(12), 97–105.
    3. [3] Lasagabaster, D., 2022. English-medium instruction in higher education. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
    4. [4] De Costa, P.I., Green-Eneix, C.A., Li, W., 2022. Problematizing EMI language policy in a transnational world: China's entry into the global higher education market. English Today. 38(2), 80–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026607842000005X
    5. [5] Banafi, N., 2025. Status of the English language program considering Saudi Vision 2030: from students' perspectives. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education. 10(1), 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00311-y
    6. [6] San Jose, D.B.S., Tinagan, J.M., Ratunil, M.L.G., 2025. Digital Tools in TESOL: An Ethnographic Investigation of Technology Use Among Japanese Senior High School Students. International Journal of Innovative Studies in Humanities and Social Studies. 1(1), 48–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71123/ijishs.v1.i1.25006
    7. [7] San Jose, D.B.S., Refareal, A.O., 2025. Teaching English, Living Japanese: Autoethnographic Exploration of a Filipino English Teacher's Journey in Japan. International Journal of Innovative Studies in Humanities and Social Studies. 1(2), 9–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.71123/ijishs.v1.i2.25002
    8. [8] San Jose, D.B.S., Guitche, M.Q., Madrigal, D.V., 2024. English Proficiency of Japanese Third-Age Learners in the English Foreign Language Program: An Explanatory-Sequential Inquiry. 3L, Language, Linguistics, Literature. 30(4), 220–240. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2024-3004-16
    9. [9] San Jose, D.B.S., Guitche, M.Q., Madrigal, D.V., 2024. Unveiling the "Whys" of Japanese Third-age Learners' English Language Proficiency. Philippine Social Science Journal. 7(3), 60–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v7i3.1000
    10. [10] San Jose, D.B.S., Guitche, M.Q., Bual, J., et al., 2024. English proficiency of Japanese third-age learners: A Quantitative Inquiry. Technium Social Sciences Journal. 57(1), 27–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v57i1.10985
    11. [11] San Jose, D.B.S., Madrigal, D.V., 2023. Lost in translation: Experiences of the Japanese senior citizens in learning the English language. Philippine Social Science Journal. 6(2), 16–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52006/main.v6i2.748
    12. [12] Lowe, R.J., 2024. Native-speakerism,(dis)empowerment, and paradoxes of internationalization: An autoethnography of success and failure in language teaching and learning in Japan. In: Gurney, L., Wedikkarage, L. (eds.). Language Education Policies in Multilingual Settings: Exploring Rhetoric and Realities in Situ. Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 17–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57484-9_2
    13. [13] Kirkpatrick, R., Kirkpatrick, J., Derakhshan, A., 2024. An investigation into the motivation and attitudes of Japanese students toward learning English: A case of elementary and junior high school students. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education. 9(1), 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00243-z
    14. [14] Gurney, P., Michaud, M., 2024. English Language Education and the Internationalization of Higher Education in Japan. TESOL Communications. 3(2), 15–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58304/tc.20240202
    15. [15] Aizawa, I., 2025. A comparative study of Japanese and English medium instruction: The driving factors behind academic success. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 46(2), 379–391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2184476
    16. [16] Badawi, H., 2024. Exploring Classroom Discipline Strategies and Cultural Dynamics: Lessons from the Japanese Education System. Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education. 5(1), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v5i1.663
    17. [17] Egitim, S., 2024. Does language teachers' intercultural competence influence oral participation in EFL classrooms?: unveiling learner perspectives through a mixed methods inquiry. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2024.2306169
    18. [18] Tarisayi, K.S., 2023. Autoethnography as a qualitative methodology: Conceptual foundations, techniques, benefits and limitations. Encyclopaideia. 27(67), 53–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1825-8670/17815
    19. [19] Clandinin, D.J., 2022. Engaging in narrative inquiry. Routledge: New York, NY, USA.
    20. [20] Dörfler, V., Stierand, M., 2021. Bracketing: A phenomenological theory applied through transpersonal reflexivity. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 34(4), 778–793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-12-2019-0393
    21. [21] Luo, Z., 2024. A Review of Krashen's Input Theory. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences. 26(1), 130–135.
    22. [22] Lichtman, K., VanPatten, B., 2021. Was Krashen right? Forty years later. Foreign Language Annals. 54(2), 283–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12552
    23. [23] Alharbi, J.M., 2023. Insight into the Role of Interaction in Language Acquisition: Vygotsky's Interactionist Theory of Language. Arab World English Journal. 14(2), 281–294. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no2.20
    24. [24] Willis, J., 2022. An evolution of a framework for TBLT: What trainers and teachers need to know to help learners succeed in task-based learning. In: Sudharshana, N.P., Mukhopadhyay, L. (eds.). Task-based Language Teaching and Assessment: Contemporary Reflections from Across the World. Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore. pp. 63–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4226-5_5
    25. [25] Tzuriel, D., 2021. The socio-cultural theory of Vygotsky. Mediated Learning and Cognitive Modifiability. Springer Cham: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 53–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75692-5_3
    26. [26] Homayouni, M., 2022. Peer assessment in group-oriented classroom contexts: On the effectiveness of peer assessment coupled with scaffolding and group work on speaking skills and vocabulary learning. Language Testing in Asia. 12(1), 61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00211-3
    27. [27] Benati, A., 2021. Focus on form. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762656
    28. [28] Aubrey, S., 2022. Enhancing long-term learner engagement through project-based learning. ELT Journal. 76(4), 441–451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccab032
    29. [29] Lowie, W., Verspoor, M., 2022. A complex dynamic systems theory perspective on speaking in second language development. In: Derwing, T.M., Munro, M.J., Thomson, R.I. (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Speaking. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 39–53.
    30. [30] Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A.H., Evans, R., 2022. Complex dynamic systems theory in language learning: a scoping review of 25 years of research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 44(4), 913–941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000553
    31. [31] Imperial, R.A., 2025. Rethinking global Englishes and moving toward reparative redress for language-minoritized and racialized TESOL practitioners. TESOL Quarterly. 59(1), 310–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3338
    32. [32] Dörnyei, Z., Ushioda, E., 2021. Teaching and researching motivation. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351006743
    33. [33] Yousefi, M., Mahmoodi, M.H., 2022. The L2 motivational self-system: A meta-analysis approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 32(2), 274–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12416
    34. [34] Csizér, K., 2019. The L2 motivational self system. In: Lamb, M., Csizér, K., Henry, A., et al. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Motivation for Language Learning. Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 71–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28380-3_4
    35. [35] Fernandes, F.R., Silva, H.D.F.N., Menezes, G.G., et al., 2022. Three Decades of Communities of Practice Conceptualization: revisiting the foundations of Lave and Wenger's constructs and their impact on contemporary learning theory. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research. 10(4), 200–220.
    36. [36] Graven, M., Lerman, S., 2003. Wenger, E.(1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 6, 185–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023947624004
    37. [37] Zhang, Y., 2023. The contribution of personal investment theory of motivation in second language acquisition. Heliyon. 9(6), e16681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16681
    38. [38] Cook, V., 2022. 2 Multi-competence and Translanguaging. In: MacSwan, J. (ed.). Multilingual Perspectives on Translanguaging. Multilingual Matters: Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit, USA. pp. 45–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800415690-004
    39. [39] Azhar, I.P., Gopal, R., 2021. Effects of "English-only policy" on students' fluency and motivation level in speaking English. The English Teacher. 50(3), 157–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52696/EGJQ3860
    40. [40] Jabbar, S.A., 2025. Code-switching as a pedagogical tool for scaffolding in ESL classrooms. Journal of English Language and Literature (JOELL). 12(1), 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54513/JOELL.2025.12101
    41. [41] Bozorgian, H., Fallah, S., Taghizade, M., 2025. EFL Teacher Code-Switching in Early Adolescent Vocabulary Learning. Teaching English as a Second Language Quarterly (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills). 44(2), 101–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22099/tesl.2025.51723.3354
    42. [42] Naseer, R., Ahmed, T., 2025. Is code switching beneficial in a bilingualism classroom? A qualitative analysis of the teachers' perception. Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review. 3(1), 1691–1701.
    43. [43] Ristiamadani, C., Tauchid, A., 2025. An Analysis of English Code Switching and Code Mixing Used in Narrative story during Speaking Class. INTENS (International Journal of English Education and Linguistics). 2(01), 46–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32665/intens.v2i01.2201
    44. [44] Khaliq, N., Ahmed, T., 2025. The role of code-switching in English language teaching at a tertiary level in Lahore: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT). 8(1), 281–290.
    45. [45] Congmin, Z., 2021. Fundamental theories of second language acquisition: The input hypothesis, the output hypothesis, and the interaction hypothesis. Sino-US English Teaching. 18(7), 192–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8072/2021.07.003
    46. [46] Liu, X., 2022. The relation of input, interaction, and output in SLA. Proceedings of the 2022 7th International Conference on Social Sciences and Economic Development (ICSSED 2022); 25–27 March 2022; Wuhan, China. pp. 474–479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220405.078
    47. [47] MacSwan, J., Rolstad, K., 2024. (Un)grounded language ideologies: A brief history of translanguaging theory. International Journal of Bilingualism. 28(4), 719–743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069241236703
    48. [48] Anwar, M.N., Sultan, A., Ali, F., et al., 2024. Application of Behaviorist Theory in Classroom Instructional Reforms. Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 5(2), 341–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55737/qjssh.319972469
    49. [49] Darder, A., Hernandez, K., Lam, K.D., et al., 2023. Critical pedagogy: An introduction. In: Darder, A., Hernandez, K., Lam, K.D., et al. (eds.). The Critical Pedagogy Reader. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–30.
    50. [50] McLaren, P., 2023. Critical pedagogy: A look at the major concepts. In: Darder, A., Hernandez, K., Lam, K.D., et al. (eds.). The Critical Pedagogy Reader. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 75–97.
    51. [51] Williams, C.H., 2022. Spatial representation and sociolinguistic synergies. Sociolinguistica. 36(1–2), 231–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/soci-2022-0016
    52. [52] Toomaneejinda, A., Saengboon, S., 2022. Interactional Sociolinguistics: The Theoretical Framework and Methodological Approach to ELF Interaction Research. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network. 15(1), 156–179.
    53. [53] Jin, S., Peng, L., 2022. Classroom perception in higher education: The impact of spatial factors on student satisfaction in lecture versus active learning classrooms. Frontiers in Psychology. 13, 941285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941285
    54. [54] Hirata, E., Asai, T., 2022. Enhancing the Learning Process Through Group Dynamics. Bulletin of Nagoya University of Foreign Studies [in Japanese]. 11, 243–267.
    55. [55] Pranena, I.M.W., 2022. U-shape and Cluster Seating Arrangement in Teaching English as Foreign Language in Yayasan Dana Punia. Journal of Educational Study. 2(2), 168–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36663/joes.v2i2.364
    56. [56] Tao, J., Gao, X.A., 2021. Language teacher agency. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108916943
    57. [57] Kua, J., Lim, W.S., Teo, W., et al., 2021. A scoping review of adaptive expertise in education. Medical Teacher. 43(3), 347–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1851020
    58. [58] Mydin, A.A., Alaklabi, S., Alomar, A., 2022. A review of teachers' self-efficacy and to what extent it is influenced by instructional leadership in educational institutions. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies. 13(9), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14456/ITJEMAST.2022.181
    Back to top