Article

Ink, Paper, Bodyminds and Ideas: Material Consciousness in Architectural Sketching

Otto Paans ORCID
    Received: 29 July 2025 | Revised: 2 June 2026 | Accepted: 9 June 2026 | Published Online: 16 June 2026

    Abstract

    Sketching in the context of architecture has often been framed as either the intellectual development of an idea by visual means, or more recently as a heuristic instrument. In both cases, the influence of the lived body and subjective experience have been sidelined. This article investigates these material conditions of architectural sketching. I examine the notion of a “cultural technique” (Kulturtechnik), highlighting how architectural sketching is always predicated on a set of norms and practices that precede and sustain its creative potential. I provide an interdisciplinary framework drawn from philosophy of science, media theory, cognitive science and cultural studies, drawing parallels between the ways in which artistic and scientific modes of experimentation are conducted and materialized. I examine the material aspects of sketching practices, as well the defining characteristic of cultural techniques: they enable and sustain an experimental system around themselves. Such cultures are predicated on material conditions, which must be understood to gain insight into the efficiency of sketching. I consider selected material factors that play decisive roles in sketching practices regarded as a cultural technique, illustrated by a series of sketches. These are the role of fluid media like ink, enabling a seamless transmission from ideas to the physical domain; the shaping of the bodymind in gesturing and enacting architectural ideas; and the role of sketching paper, its spatial properties and its diaphaneity in developing architectural ideas. Jointly, these factors constitute a preliminary account for the “material consciousness” of architectural sketching.

    Keywords

    Sketching, Design Thinking, Cultural Technique, Experimental System, Aesthetic Knowledge, Design Cognition

    References
    1. [1] Cross, N., 1982. Designerly Ways of Knowing. Design Studies. 3(4), 221–227.
    2. [2] Cross, N., 2001. Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline versus Design Science. Design Issues. 17(3), 49–55.
    3. [3] Cross, N., 2007. Designerly Ways of Knowing. Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland.
    4. [4] von Buttlar, A., 2003. Design approaches in architecture [Entwurfswege in der Architektur]. In: Mattenklott, G., Weltzien, F. (Eds.). Design and Drafting: Practice and Theory of the Artistic Creative Process [Entwerfen und Entwurf. Praxis und Theorie des künstlerischen Schaffensprozesses]. Reimer: Berlin, Germany. pp. 127–148. (in German)
    5. [5] Gethmann, D., Hauser, S., 2009. Cultural Technique of Design: Practices, Concepts and Media in Architecture and Design Science [Kulturtechnik Entwerfen. Praktiken, Konzepte und Medien in Architektur und Design Science]. Transcript Verlag: Bielefeld, Germany. (in German)
    6. [6] Schmid, V., 2011. Design and construction in the sciences [Entwurf und Konstruktion in die Wissenschaften]. In: Frank, U., Schmid, V., Weidinger, J. (Eds.). Design and Construction in Teaching, Application and Theory [Entwerfen und Konstruieren in Lehre, Anwendung und Theorie]. Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin: Berlin, Germany. pp. 42–48. (in German)
    7. [7] Hauser, S., 2013. Processes of transgression: Design as a cultural technique [Verfahren des Überschreitens. Entwerfen als Kulturtechnik]. In: Ammon, S., Froschauer, E.-M. (Eds.). Designing Science [Wissenschaft Entwerfen]. Wilhelm Fink Verlag: München, Germany. pp. 363–381. (in German)
    8. [8] Siegert, B., 2015. Cultural Techniques: Grids, Filters, Doors and Other Articulations of the Real. Fordham University Press: New York, NY, USA.
    9. [9] Sennett, R., 2008. The Craftsman. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA.
    10. [10] Ferguson, E.S., 1992. Engineering and the Mind’s Eye. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
    11. [11] Carpo, M., 2011. The Alphabet and the Algorithm. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
    12. [12] Carpo, M., 2017. The Second Digital Turn: Design Beyond Intelligence. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
    13. [13] Little, A., 2013. Image and nature in Alberti’s De pictura: A case of ‘model inversion’? Albertiana, 16, 47–74.
    14. [14] Günther, H., 2024. Drawing instead of Writing as an Intellectual Medium in the Renaissance. In: Colonnese, F., Grancho, N., Schaeverbeke, R. (Eds.). Approaches to Drawing in Architecture and Urban Design. Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. pp. 129–159.
    15. [15] Pérez-Gómez, A., 2016. Timely Meditations: Architectural Philosophy and Hermeneutics, Vol. 2. Rightangle Publishing: Montréal, Canada.
    16. [16] Ammon, S., 2018. Drawing Inferences: Thinking with 6B (and Sketching Paper). Philosophy & Technology. 32, 591–612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0323-5
    17. [17] Goodman, N., 1978. Ways of Worldmaking. Hackett Publishing: Indianapolis, IN, USA.
    18. [18] Frascari, M., 2007. Introduction. Models and Drawings. The Invisible Nature of Architecture. In: Frascari, M., Hale, J., Starkey, B. (Eds.). From Models to Drawings. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 1–9.
    19. [19] Grennan, S., 2022. Thinking about Drawing: An Introduction to Themes and Concepts. Bloomsbury: London, UK.
    20. [20] Nancy, J.-L., 2013. The Pleasure in Drawing. Fordham University Press: New York, NY, USA.
    21. [21] Pombo, F., Magalhães, G., 2006. Drawing in the Project: Image and Object. In Proceedings of the Wonderground—DRS International Conference 2006, Lisbon, Portugal, 1–4 November 2006.
    22. [22] Newell, A., 1967. Heuristic Programming: Ill-Structured Programming. Carnegie Mellon University: Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
    23. [23] Rittel, H., Webber, M., 1973. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences. 4(2), 155–169.
    24. [24] Simon, H., 1973. The Structure of Ill Structured Problems. Artificial Intelligence. 4, 181–201.
    25. [25] Simon, H., 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
    26. [26] Cook, P., 2018. Drawing: The Motive Force of Architecture, 2nd ed. Wiley: Chichester, UK.
    27. [27] Maturana, H., Varela, F., 1980. Autopoiesis and Cognition. D. Reidel Publishing Company: Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
    28. [28] Gallagher, S., 2005. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
    29. [29] Varela, F., Thompson, E., Rosch, E., 2016. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Behaviour. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
    30. [30] Alexander, C., 2025. What Is 4E Cognitive Science? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-025-10055-w
    31. [31] Pert, C., 1993. Molecules of Emotion: Why You Feel the Way You Feel. Scribner/Simon and Schuster: New York, NY, USA.
    32. [32] Hayles, N.K., 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics. Chicago University Press: Chicago, IL, USA.
    33. [33] Jullien, F., 1999. The Propensity of Things: Towards a History of Efficacy in China. Zone Books: New York, NY, USA.
    34. [34] Shi, X., 2015. Writing Forces: Revisiting the Aesthetic Concept of Shi 勢 in Chinese Calligraphy Criticism. In Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Arts & Humanities 2015, Osaka, Japan, 2–5 April 2015.
    35. [35] Jullien, F., 2012. The Great Image Has No Form, Or on the Nonobject through Painting. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA.
    36. [36] Frascari, M., 2011. Eleven Exercises in the Art of Architectural Drawing: Slow Food for the Architectural Imagination. Routledge: London, UK.
    37. [37] Frascari, M., 2009. Lines as Architectural Thinking. Architectural Theory Review. 14, 200–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13264820903341605
    38. [38] Belardi, P., 2014. Why Architects Still Draw: Two Lectures on Architectural Drawing. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
    39. [39] Krämer, S., Bredekamp, H., 2013. Culture, Technology, Cultural Technique—Moving beyond Text. Theory, Culture & Society. 30(6), 20–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413496287
    40. [40] Schüttpelz, E., 2006. The media-anthropological turn in cultural techniques. Archive for Media History. 6, 87–110.
    41. [41] Guilherme, P., Salema, S., 2022. Álvaro Siza Vieira Malagueira’s Notebooks: A Reading on the Relevance of Drawing for Architectural Research. In: Ródenas-López, A., Calvo-López, M., Salcedo-Galera, M. (Eds.). Architectural Graphics: Graphics for Education and Thought, Vol. III. Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, Switzerland.
    42. [42] Winthrop-Young, G., 2014. The Kultur of Cultural Techniques: Conceptual Inertia and the Parasitic Materialities of Ontologization. Cultural Politics. 10(3), 376–388.
    43. [43] Emmons, P., 2019. Drawing Imagining Building: Embodiment in Architectural Design Practices. Routledge: Oxon, UK.
    44. [44] Knorr Cetina, K., 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
    45. [45] Rheinberger, H.-J., 2019. Experimental Systems and Epistemic Things: A History of Protein Synthesis in the Test Tube, 3rd ed [Experimentalsysteme und epistemische Dinge. Eine Geschichte der Proteinsynthese im Reagenzglas, 3rd edn]. Wallstein: Göttingen, Germany. (in German)
    46. [46] Rheinberger, H.-J., 2021. Crack and Joint: A Phenomenology of Experimentation, 2nd ed [Spalt und Fuge. Eine Phänomenologie des Experiments, 2nd edn]. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt, Germany. (in German)
    47. [47] Rheinberger, H.-J., 2007. Epistemology of the Concrete: Studies on the History of Modern Biology [Epistemologie des Konkreten. Studien zur Geschichte der modernen Biologie]. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt, Germany. (in German)
    48. [48] Flusser, V., 1994. Gestures: An Attempt at a Phenomenology [Gesten. Versuch einer Phänomenologie]. Fischer Verlag: Frankfurt, Germany. (in German)
    49. [49] Badiou, A., 2006. Drawing. Lacanian Ink. 28, 42–48.
    50. [50] Derrida, J., 1993. Memoirs of the Blind: The Self-Portrait and Other Ruins. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA.
    51. [51] Siegert, B., 2017. Opening, closing, dispersing, condensing: The operative ontologies of cultural technique [Öffnen, Schließen, Zerstreuen, Verdichten. Die operativen Ontologien der Kulturtechnik]. ZMK Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturforschung. 8(2), 95–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/18686 (in German)
    52. [52] Heidegger, M., 2008. Being and Time. HarperPerennial: New York, NY, USA.
    53. [53] Nancy, J.-L., 1997. The Gravity of Thought. Humanities Press: Atlantic Highlands, NJ, USA.
    54. [54] Michlewski, K., 2008. Uncovering Design Attitude: Inside the Culture of Designers. Organization Studies. 29, 373–392.
    55. [55] Downey, G., Lende, D.H., 2012. Neuroanthropology and the Encultured Brain. In: Lende, D.H., Downey, G. (Eds.). The Encultured Brain: An Introduction to Neuroanthropology. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 23–66.
    56. [56] Frascari, M., 2007. A Reflection on Paper and Its Virtues within the Material and Invisible Factures of Architecture. In: Frascari, M., Hale, J., Starkey, B. (Eds.). From Models to Drawings. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 23–33.
    57. [57] Paans, O., 2024. Nebula Rasa: The Diaphanous as Generative Stimulus in Architectural Design. Arts and Communication. 2(1), 1922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36922/AC.1922
    58. [58] Mottram, J., 2007. Marks in Space: Thinking about Drawing. In: Frascari, M., Hale, J., Starkey, B. (Eds.). From Models to Drawings. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 193–200.
    59. [59] Howell, B., Hoftijzer, J., Novoa Munoz, M., 2024. Design Sketching and Visualization, Futures & Research. In Proceedings of the DRS2024, Boston, MA, USA, 23–28 June 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.158
    60. [60] Fitch, D., 2011. Drawing from Drawing. In: Kantrowitz, A., Brew, A., Fava, M. (Eds.). Thinking Through Drawing: Practice into Knowledge. Teachers College Press: New York, NY, USA. pp. 147–150.
    61. [61] Van Der Wal, A., Hoftijzer, J.-W., Haans, M., 2024. A Framework for the Agency of Sketching. In Proceedings of the DRS2024, Boston, MA, USA, 23–28 June 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.806
    62. [62] Dernie, D., 2013. Drawing and the Material Conditions of Space. Tracey Journal. 1–11.
    63. [63] Güss, C.D., Ahmed, S., Dörner, D., 2021. From da Vinci’s Flying Machines to a Theory of the Creative Process. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 16(6), 1184–1197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966790
    64. [64] Price, L.A., 1994. Line and Shadow: The Role of Ink in American Architectural Drawings Prior to 1860. Available from: https://cool.culturalheritage.org/coolaic/sg/bpg/annual/v13/bp13-08.html (cited 21 July 2025).
    65. [65] Sauter, F., Moos von, C., 2022. Some Fragments. Verlag der Buchhandlung Walther und Franz König: Berlin, Germany.
    66. [66] Schön, D., 1992. Designing as Reflective Conversation with the Materials of a Design Situation. Knowledge Based Systems. 5(1), 3–14.
    67. [67] McNeill, D., 2005. Gesture and Thought. Chicago University Press: Chicago, IL, USA.
    68. [68] Paans, O., 2024. Handscapes. Gestures as Agents of Change and Mimetic Awareness. Dimensions: Journal of Architectural Knowledge. 9, 243–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14361/DAK-2023-0614
    69. [69] Pallasmaa, J., 2009. Existential and Embodied Wisdom in Architecture: The Thinking Hand. Wiley: Chichester, UK.
    70. [70] Sequeira, J., 2025. A Phenomenological Perspective of Architectural Drawings/Design. In: Ming Kong, M.S., do Rosário Monteiro, M., Pereira Neto, M.J. (Eds.). Creation, Transformation and Metamorphosis. CRC Press: London, UK. pp. 80–85.
    71. [71] Kang, S., Tversky, B., 2016. From Hands to Minds: Gestures Promote Understanding. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. 1, 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0004-9
    72. [72] Shields, J.A.E., 2023. Phenomenology and Architecture: Examining Embodied Experience and Graphic Representations of the Built Environment. In: Yoshimi, J., Walsh, P., London, P. (Eds.). Horizons of Phenomenology. Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 285–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26074-2_15
    73. [73] Tversky, B., 2019. Mind in Motion: How Action Shapes Thought. Basic Books: New York, NY, USA.
    74. [74] Goldin-Meadow, S., Beilock, S.L., 2010. Action's Influence on Thought: The Case of Gesture. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 5, 664–674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610388764
    75. [75] Harrison, S., 2018. The Impulse to Gesture: Where Language, Minds and Bodies Intersect. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108265065
    76. [76] Klooster, N.B., Cook, S.W., Uc, E.Y., et al., 2015. Gestures Make Memories, But What Kind? Patients with Impaired Procedural Memory Display Disruptions in Gesture Production and Comprehension. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01054
    77. [77] Haarmann, A., 2019. Artistic Research. Eine Epistemologische Ästhetik. Transcript Verlag: Bielefeld, Germany.
    78. [78] Zembylas, T., 2011. Epistemology of Artistic Practice [Epistemologie der Künstlerischen Praxis]. Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und Allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft. 56(2), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28937/1000106188 (in German)
    79. [79] Paans, O., 2024. Within the Space of Drawing. Lines and the Locus of Creation in Architectural Design. Journal for Research in Philosophy and History. 7(1), 36–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22158/jrph.v7n1p36
    80. [80] Emmons, P., 2022. Animate Instruments: Imagination and Architectural Drawing. In: Goffi, F. (Ed.). The Routledge Companion to Architectural Drawings and Models: From Translating to Archiving, Collecting and Displaying. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 293–307.
    81. [81] Hanna, R., Maiese, M., 2009. Embodied Minds in Action. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
    82. [82] Martel, M., Cardinali, L., Roy, A.C., et al., 2016. Tool-use: An Open Window into Body Representation and Its Plasticity. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 33(1–2), 82–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2016.1167678
    83. [83] Geuze, A., Van Eldijk, J., Van Kan, L., 2002. Experience, Intuition and Conception. In: De Jong, T., Van Der Voordt, D.J.M. (Eds.). Ways to Study and Research: Urban, Architectural and Technical Design. Delft University Press: Delft, The Netherlands. pp. 419–422.
    84. [84] De Brabander, L., 2022. On the Fragility of Empathy: Drawing as Empathic Musing [PhD Thesis]. KU Leuven: Gent/Leuven, Belgium.
    85. [85] Csikszentmihalyi, M., 2008. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. HarperCollins: New York, NY, USA.
    86. [86] Kantrowitz, A., 2022. Drawing Thought: How Drawing Helps Us Observe, Discover, and Invent. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
    87. [87] Rawes, P., 2007. Acts of Imagination and Reflection in Architectural Design. In: Frascari, M., Hale, J., Starkey, B. (Eds.). From Models to Drawings. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 261–269.
    88. [88] Hertzberger, H., 2002. Perceiving and Conceiving. In: De Jong, T., Van Der Voordt, D.J.M. (Eds.). Ways to Study and Research: Urban, Architectural and Technical Design. Delft University Press: Delft, The Netherlands. pp. 399–412.
    89. [89] Paans, O., Pasel, R., 2022. Thinking through Designing: Design Theory 2017–2020. Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin: Berlin, Germany. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-16307
    90. [90] Schön, D., 1987. The Reflective Practitioner, 2nd ed. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
    91. [91] Höök, K., Löwgren, J., 2012. Strong Concepts: Intermediate-level Knowledge in Interaction Design Research, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 19(3), 23.
    92. [92] De Certeau, M., 1988. The Practice of Everyday Life. University of California Press: Berkeley/Los Angeles, CA, USA.
    93. [93] Paans, O., 2022. Field Notes from Design Space: Essays in Design Theory. Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin: Berlin, Germany. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-16309
    94. [94] Pirolli, P., 1992. Knowledge and Processes in Design. University of California at Berkeley: Berkeley, CA, USA.
    95. [95] Kuch, U., 2019. In the Intermediate Realm of Architecture: Introduction [Im zwischenreich der architektur: Einleitung]. In: Kuch, U. (Ed.). The Diaphanous: Architecture and Its Imagery [Das Diaphane: Architektur und ihre Bildlichkeit]. Transcript Verlag: Bielefeld, Germany. pp. 18–29. (in German)
    96. [96] Palmboom, F., 2020. Redrawing the Map—Oscillating between Resemblance and Alienation. Oase: Journal for Architecture. 107, 35–37.
    97. [97] Goldschmidt, G., 1991. The Dialectics of Sketching. Creativity Research Journal. 4, 123–143.
    98. [98] Forster, K., 2019. View transparency insight [Ansicht-durchsicht-einsicht]. In: Kuch, U. (Ed.). The Diaphanous: Architecture and Its Imagery [Das Diaphane: Architektur und ihre Bildlichkeit]. Transcript Verlag: Bielefeld, Germany. pp. 126–127. (in German)
    99. [99] Goldschmidt, G., 1994. On Visual Design Thinking: The VIs Kids of Architecture. Design Studies. 15(2), 158–174.
    Back to top