Article

Aura: An Elusive Concept in Art Theory and Museum Practice

Werner Schweibenz ORCID
    Received: 13 March 2026 | Revised: 31 May 2026 | Accepted: 7 June 2026| Published Online: 15 June 2026

    Abstract

    According to Tate’s online glossary Art Terms, aura is a quality integral to an artwork that cannot be communicated through mechanical reproduction techniques. So what happens to the aura in the age of digital reproduction? The paper describes the origin of this concept, which was introduced by the author and art critic Walter Benjamin in 1936 and became popular in the 1980s. Today, aura is used in many different contexts, often as a matter of course and without any explanation. It is not possible to speak of a uniform use of the term; it often appears more as an essayistic auxiliary construct than as a scientifically elaborated, theoretically and empirically sound concept. Nevertheless, aura is one of the essential concepts in the context of the historical authenticity of the object, as it guarantees its authenticity and uniqueness. This paper spans from object and auratisation to the relationship of original and (digital) reproduction to the migration of aura to the (perfect) copy. The quality of the reproduction plays a central role in the career of a work of art, whose appreciation is shown by its reproductions and their mass distribution, both through photography and digitally on the internet. The thesis of the migration of aura suggests that it can be created or transmitted by presentation and narration, both in the real world and the digital realm.

    Keywords

    Artwork, Atmosphere, Authenticity, Aura, Auratisation, Original, Reproduction, Walter Benjamin

    References
    1. [1] The Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, n.d. Aura. Available from: https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/a/aura (cited 20 February 2026).
    2. [2] Fürnkäs, J., 2000. Aura. In: Oppitz, M., Wizisla, E. (Eds.). Benjamin’s Concepts. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main, Germany. pp. 95–146. (in German)
    3. [3] Hansen, M.B., 2008. Benjamin’s Aura. Critical Inquiry. 34(2), 336–375.
    4. [4] Weindl, R., 2019. The "Aura" of the Original in the Museum: On the Connection between Authenticity and Visitor Interest. transcript Verlag: Bielefeld, Germany. (in German)
    5. [5] Tyradellis, D., 2014. Tired Museums, or: How Exhibitions Could Change Our Thinking. Körber-Stiftung: Hamburg, Germany. (in German)
    6. [6] Kohle, H., 2018. Museums Go Digital: A Memory Institution Seeks to Connect with the Future. Heidelberg University Publishing: Heidelberg, Germany. p. 20. (in German)
    7. [7] Aboudrar, B.N., 2023. Aura. In: Mairesse, F. (Ed.). Dictionary of Museology (ICOM). ICOM: London, UK. p. 37.
    8. [8] Korff, G., 1984. Object and information in conflict: The new debate on the history museum. In: Eberspächer, M., König, G., Tschofen, B. (Eds.). Museum Objects: Depositing–Exhibiting. Böhlau: Köln, Germany. pp. 113–125. (in German).
    9. [9] Korff, G., 1992. On the peculiarity of museum objects. In: Eberspächer, M., König, G., Tschofen, B. (Eds.). Museum Objects: Depositing–Exhibiting. Böhlau: Köln, Germany. pp. 140–145. (in German)
    10. [10] Herles, D., 1996. The Museum and Objects: Science, Presentation, Education. Campus: Frankfurt am Main, Germany. p. 78. (in German)
    11. [11] Stopka, K., 2022. Aura. In: Sabrow, M., Saupe, A. (Eds.). Handbook of Historical Authenticity. Wallstein Verlag: Göttingen, Germany. pp. 32–40. (in German)
    12. [12] Schweibenz, W., 2024. Digital materialities and “real things”: Some thoughts on digital objects and the museum. Museologica Brunensia. 13(2), 2–14.
    13. [13] Groys, B., 2003. The Topology of the Aura. In: Groys, B. (Ed.). Topology of Art. Hanser: München, Germany. pp. 33–46. (in German)
    14. [14] Elo, M., 2005. Return of the aura. In: Schulte, C. (Ed.). Walter Benjamin's Media Theory. UVK: Konstanz, Germany. pp. 117–135. (in German)
    15. [15] Beil, U.J., Herberichs, C., Sandl, M. (Eds.), 2014. Benjamin's Aura Concept and Historical Mediology: Approaches, Contexts, Perspectives. In Aura and Auratization: Mediological Perspectives Following Walter Benjamin. Chronos: Zürich, Switzerland. (in German)
    16. [16] Wieland, M., 2019. Aura—From the Dignity to the Digitality of the Document. In: Kastberger, K., Maurer, S., Neuhuber, C. (Eds.). Schauplatz Archiv: Objekt–Narrativ–Performance. De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany. pp. 89–106. (in German)
    17. [17] Benjamin, W., 1985. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. In: Arendt, H. (Ed.). Zohn, H. (Trans.). Illuminations—Essays and Reflections. Schocken Books: New York, NY, USA.
    18. [18] Hazan, S., 2001. The virtual aura: Is there space for enchantment in a technological world? In Proceedings of Museums and the Web 2001, Seattle, WA, USA, 14–17 March 2001; pp. 209–217.
    19. [19] Saupe, A., n.d. Authenticity. Available from: http://docupedia.de/zg/saupe_authentizitaet_v3_en_2016 (cited 20 February 2026).
    20. [20] Wesener, A., 2014. The Good, the Bad, the Authentic: An Evaluation of Concepts, Experiences, and Considered Values of Authenticity of Place in the Context of the Post-Industrial City. Königshausen und Neumann: Würzburg, Germany. p. 154.
    21. [21] Hufnagel, S., 2019. Case Study 1: Beltracchi and the History of Art Fraud in Germany. In: Hufnagel, S., Chappell, D. (Eds.). The Palgrave Handbook on Art Crime. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks: London, UK. pp. 321–342.
    22. [22] Carmo, J., 2023. For a new museology: The aura, the place and the museum. In: do Rosário Monteiro, M., Ming Kong, M., Pereira Neto, M. (Eds.). Time and Space. CRC Press: London, UK. pp. 423–428.
    23. [23] Spangenberg, P.M., 2000. Aura. In: Barck, K., Fontius, M., Thierse, W. (Eds.). Basic Aesthetic Concepts: Studies for a Historical Dictionary in Seven Volumes, Vol. 1. Akad.-Verlag: Berlin, Germany. pp. 400–416. (in German)
    24. [24] Bredekamp, H., 2010. Theory of the Image-Creating Act: Frankfurt Adorno Lectures 2007. Suhrkamp Verlag: Berlin, Germany. (in German)
    25. [25] Dorrian, M., 2014. Museum atmospheres: Notes on aura, distance and affect. The Journal of Architecture. 19(2), 187–201.
    26. [26] Paschou, S., Papaioannou, G., 2023. Exploring the Digital Atmosphere of Museums: Perspectives and Potential. Technologies. 11(5), 149.
    27. [27] Hampp, C., Schwan, S., 2014. Perception and evaluation of authentic objects: Findings from a visitor study. Museum Management and Curatorship. 29(4), 349–367.
    28. [28] Kohl, K., 2003. The Power of Things: History and Theory of Sacred Objects. Beck: München, Germany. pp. 10, 12, 15. (in German)
    29. [29] Saupe, A., 2017. Relics of Contact: The Historical-Religious Charge of Authenticity in the Historical Museum. In: Eser, T., Farrenkopf, M., Kimmel, D., et al. (Eds.). Authentication in the Museum: A Workshop Report. Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum: Mainz, Germany. pp. 45–58. (in German)
    30. [30] Herrmann, H., 2003. Encyclopedia of the Most Curious Relics: From the Breath of Jesus to the Tooth of Muhammad. Rütten & Loening: Berlin, Germany. (in German)
    31. [31] Laube, S., 2012. From Relic to Thing. Akademie Verlag: Berlin, Germany. p. 10. (in German)
    32. [32] Bredekamp, H., 1999. The Simulated Benjamin: Medieval Remarks on His Relevance Today. In: Berndt, A. (Ed.). Frankfurt School and Art History. Reimer: Berlin, Germany. pp. 117–140. (in German)
    33. [33] Pricken, M., 2014. The Aura of Value: Products Are Created in Companies, Values in the Mind. 80 Strategies. VCH: New York, NY, USA. pp. 12–16. (in German)
    34. [34] Liedel, F., 2024. Experiencing authenticity as a symbolic act: On signs and meanings in virtual exhibition spaces. In: Bahr, A., Fröhlich, G. (Eds.). “Ain’t Nothing Like the Real Thing?”: Forms and Functions of Media Artifact Authentication. transcript: Bielefeld, Germany. pp. 243–267. (in German)
    35. [35] Cameron, F., 2007. Beyond the Cult of the Replicant-Museums and Historical Digital Objects: Traditional Concerns, New Discourses. In: Cameron, F., Kenderdine, S. (Eds.). Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage: A Critical Discourse. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 49–75.
    36. [36] Hennion, A., Latour, B., 2003. How to make mistakes on so many things at once and become famous for it. In: Gumbrecht, H., Marrinan, M. (Eds.). Mapping Benjamin: The Work of Art in the Digital Age. Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA, USA. pp. 91–97.
    37. [37] Stoessel, M., Eggert, M.K.H., 2014. Aura. In: Samida, S., Eggert, M.K.H., Hahn, H.P. (Eds.). Handbook of Material Culture: Meanings, Concepts, Disciplines. J. B. Metzler: Stuttgart, Germany. pp. 174–180. (in German)
    38. [38] Hauskeller, M., 2005. The aura of the artwork. In: Blume, A. (Ed.). On the Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience. Karl Alber: Freiburg i. Br., Germany. pp. 65–80. (in German)
    39. [39] Schweibenz, W., 2018. The Work of Art in the Age of Digital Reproduction. Museum International. 70(1–2), 8–21.
    40. [40] Lowe, A., 2011. Pigments and some practical notes on the recording of “Wedding at Cana”. In: Gagliardi, P. (Ed.). The Miracle of Cana: The Originality of the Re-Production: The “Wedding at Cana” by Paolo Veronese; the Biography of a Painting, the Creation of a Facsimile and Its Theoretical Implications. Cierre Edizioni: Caselle di Sommacampagna (VR), Italy. pp. 93–99.
    41. [41] Lowe, A., 2011. Giving birth to the facsimile. In: Gagliardi, P. (Ed.): The Miracle of Cana: The Originality of the Re-Production: The “Wedding at Cana” by Paolo Veronese; the Biography of a Painting, the Creation of a Facsimile and Its Theoretical Implications. Cierre Edizioni: Caselle di Sommacampagna (VR), Italy. pp. 73–92.
    42. [42] Marani, P.C., 2001. Leonardo: The Painter's Work. Schirmer/Mosel: München, Germany. p. 229. (in German)
    43. [43] Hüttel, R., 1989. Reflections of a Ruin: Leonardo's Last Supper in the 19th and 20th Centuries. Jonas: Marburg, Germany. pp. 9–10. (in German)
    44. [44] Schwan, S., 2022. Aura, learning material, cultural capital: The value of museum objects for visitors. In: Farrenkopf, M., Filippidou, A., Meyer, T., et al. (Eds.). Old Things—New Values: Museumization and Valorization of Objects. Wallstein Verlag: Göttingen, Germany. pp. 253–263. (in German)
    45. [45] Berndt, L.M., 2025. Handbook for Swifties—What you can learn about art history from Taylor Swift. MONOPOL Magazine. Available from: https://www.monopol-magazin.de/was-man-von-taylor-swift-ueber-die-kunstgeschichte-lernen-kann (cited 20 February 2026). (in German)
    46. [46] Kuta, S., 2025. Why Hundreds of Taylor Swift Fans Are Flocking to See This 100-Year-Old Painting at a Museum in Germany. Smithsonian Magazine. Available from: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/why-hundreds-of-taylor-swift-fans-are-flocking-to-see-this-100-year-old-painting-at-a-museum-in-germany-180987588/ (cited 20 February 2026).
    47. [47] Latour, B., Lowe, A., 2011. The Migration of the Aura, or How to Explore the Original through Its Facsimiles. In: Bartscherer, T., Coover, R. (Eds.): Switching Codes: Thinking through Digital Technology in the Humanities and the Arts.University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA. pp. 275–297.
    48. [48] Tschirner, U., 2011. Museum, Photography and Reproduction: Media Constellations in the Underground of the Germanisches Nationalmuseum. transcript: Bielefeld, Germany. pp. 219–220. (in German)
    49. [49] Malraux, A., 1947. The Imaginary Museum. Skira: Genève, Switzerland. (in French)
    50. [50] Jeffrey, S., 2015. Challenging Heritage Visualisation: Beauty, Aura and Democratisation. Open Archaeology. 1(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2015-0008
    51. [51] Kohle, H., 2013. Digital Image Science. Hülsbusch: Glückstadt, Germany. p. 149. (in German)
    Back to top