Article

The Status Quo of Language and Gender in the Urban Informal Economic Spaces in Zambia

Pethias Siame ORCID , Raphael Prince Akeem Chisenga

    Received: 13 August 2026 | Revised: 30 September 2026 | Accepted: 8 October 2026 | Published Online: 18 October 2026

    Abstract

    The informal economy has become a lifeline for urban populations in Zambia, particularly in cities like Lusaka and Ndola. The growth is a direct response to widespread economic hardships and significant rural-urban migration. Within this vibrant sector, the intersection of language and gender remains a critically understudied area. Prevailing language policies often reflect colonial legacies, marginalizing the rich indigenous languages that are central to daily life and economic survival in the informal economy. The study investigated how language functions as a resource, shaping linguistic choices and generating economic value. The primary objective was to examine the divergent linguistic strategies employed by women and men and to assess how these gendered language practices influence their economic outcomes. Employing a qualitative, ethnographic approach, the study utilized observations, in-depth interviews, and sociolinguistic surveys in selected urban markets. The analysis is grounded in Language as a Resource Theory and Gender and Language Theory. Findings indicate that both women and men deploy a range of linguistic strategies, blending local urban varieties to suit specific economic activities, with multilingualism serving as a key tool for economic gain. The study further reveals how language use both reflects and perpetuates gender disparities in these economic settings. These insights challenge existing language frameworks in Zambia and point to a pressing need for more inclusive policies that recognize linguistic diversity and creativity.

    Keywords

    Gender, Informal Economy, Language as a Resource, Linguistic Agency, Zambia

    References
    1. [1] Krantz, S., 2024. Africa's Great Moderation. Journal of African Economics. 33(5), 515–537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejad021
    2. [2] Fåhraeus, C., 2024. The Geography of Women's Informal Entrepreneurial Activities in Urban Zambia: Place, Mobility and Locational Decision-Making. International Development Planning Review. 46(3), 297–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2024.7
    3. [3] Chen, M.A., 2006. Rethinking the Informal Economy: Linkages with the Formal Economy and the Formal Regulatory Environment. In Linking the Formal and Informal Economy: Concepts and Policies, WIDER Studies in Development Economics. Oxford Academic: Oxford, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199204764.003.0005
    4. [4] Spolsky, B., 2004. Language Policy. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615245
    5. [5] Makoni, S., Pennycook, A., 2007. Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages. Multilingual Matters: Bristol, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599255
    6. [6] Holmes, J., 2006. Gendered Talk at Work: Constructing Gender Identity through Workplace Discourse. Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754863
    7. [7] Rizki, D., Kurniawati, K., Hanif, H., et al., 2023. Gender and the Use of Local Language in an Urban Community. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Malikussaleh. 4(1), 36–51.
    8. [8] Atanga, L.L., Ellece, S.E., Litosseliti, L., et al. (Eds.), 2013. Gender and Language in Sub-Saharan Africa: Tradition, Struggle and Change. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, Netherlands. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.33
    9. [9] Hanson, S., 2010. Gender and Mobility: New Approaches for Informing Sustainability. Gender, Place & Culture. 17(1), 5–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690903498225
    10. [10] Chen, M.A., 2012. WIEGO Working Paper No. 1: The Informal Economy: Definitions, Theories and Policies. Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing (WIEGO): Cambridge, MA, USA. Available from: https://www.wiego.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/Chen_WIEGO_WP1.pdf
    11. [11] García, O., Otheguy, R., 2020. Plurilingualism and Translanguaging: Commonalities and Divergences. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. 23(1), 17–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1598932
    12. [12] Holmes, J., Meyerhoff, M., 2023. The Handbook of Language and Gender, 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA.
    13. [13] Stern, A., 2014. Domesticating the Global: Sign Writing and Visual Culture in Lusaka, Zambia. Design and Culture. 6(3), 391–411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/175470814X14105156869584
    14. [14] Nchito, W.S., 2023. Deconstructing Informality: Will the Informal/Formal Dialectic Ever End? Dialogues in Human Geography. 15(1), 77–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206231220725
    15. [15] García, O., Wei, L., 2014. Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765
    16. [16] Blommaert, J., 2010. Chapter 4: "Localizing the Global". In The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845307
    17. [17] United Nations Development Programme, 2024. Zambia Human Development Report 2023/24: Economic Informality and Sustainable Development. UNDP Zambia: Lusaka, Zambia.
    18. [18] Sunderland, J., 2004. Gendered Discourses. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230505582
    19. [19] Crenshaw, K., 1991. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review. 43(6), 1241–1299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
    20. [20] Siame, P., 2022. A Comparative Analysis of Phonological and Morpho-Syntactic Variations of the Lungu, Mambwe, and Namwanga Languages in Zambia [PhD Thesis]. University of the Western Cape: Cape Town, South Africa.
    21. [21] Siame, P., Banda, F., 2024. A Morphological Analysis of Micro-Variations on Verbal Extensions in CiLungu, CiMambwe, and CiNamwanga Languages. Comparative Linguistics, Translation, and Literary Studies. 1(1), 18–34.
    22. [22] Kendon, A., 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    23. [23] Cornwall, A., 2016. Women's Empowerment: What Works? Journal of International Development. 28(3), 342–359.
    24. [24] De Fina, A., Georgakopoulou, A., 2012. Analyzing Narrative: Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
    25. [25] Spencer-Bennett, J., 2020. The People's Critical Linguistics: Using Archival Data to Investigate Responses to Linguistic Informalisation. Language in Society. 50(2), 283–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404520000305
    26. [26] Zambia Statistics Agency, 2022. Zambia Labour Force Survey Report. Republic of Zambia: Lusaka, Zambia. Available from: https://webapps.ilo.org/surveyLib/index.php/catalog/8520
    Back to top