Article

Agricultural Dynamics and Economic Growth: Evidence from Devel oped and Developing Indian States

Jitendra Kumar Sinha ORCID
    Received: 27 March 2026 | Revised: 17 April 2026 |Accepted: 24 April 2026 | Published Online: 1 May 2026

    Abstract

    This study investigates the role of agricultural productivity, technological intensification, and structural factors in shaping economic growth across developed and developing Indian states. Using a balanced panel dataset of 22 states over the period 2001–2024 (528 observations), the analysis employs correlation techniques, fixed-effects estimation, sub-sample analysis, and Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS) to test a set of theoretically grounded hypotheses on the agriculture–growth nexus. The findings reveal pronounced structural heterogeneity across state groups. Agricultural productivity, proxied by gross value added per worker, emerges as a robust and statistically significant driver of economic growth across both developed and developing states, with relatively stronger transmission effects in more advanced economies. Technological inputs exhibit stage-specific impacts: mechanization significantly enhances growth in developing states, whereas fertilizer intensity plays a more prominent role in developed states. The interaction between machinery and fertilizer is positive and significant, confirming the complementarity hypothesis and indicating that integrated technological adoption yields higher productivity gains than isolated inputs.Agricultural trade openness exerts a consistently positive and significant effect, particularly in developed states, supporting the openness-led growth hypothesis, while its impact in developing states remains contingent on structural competitiveness. Human capital and research and development (R&D) show weak or negative short-run effects, reflecting adjustment costs and lagged returns to innovation. Population growth contributes positively, whereas institutional quality exhibits mixed but robust effects across specifications. Overall, the results highlight the importance of context-specific policy frameworks that integrate productivity enhancement, technological complementarities, trade integration, and institutional capacity for achieving sustainable and inclusive economic growth.

    Keywords

    Agricultural Productivity, Economic Growth, Structural Transformation, Technological Intensification, Trade Openness

    References
    1. [1] Tiffin, R., Irz, X., 2006. Is agriculture the engine of growth? Agricultural Economics. 35(1), 79–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2006.00141.x
    2. [2] Gollin, D., 2023. Agricultural productivity and structural transformation: Evidence and questions for African development. Oxford Development Studies. 51(4), 375–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2023.2280638
    3. [3] McArthur, J.W., McCord, G.C., 2017. Fertilizing growth: Agricultural inputs and economic development. Journal of Development Economics. 127, 133–152.
    4. [4] Solow, R.M., 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 70(1), 65–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
    5. [5] Foster, A.D., Rosenzweig, M.R., 2022. Are there too many farms in the world? Labour market transaction costs, machine capacities, and optimal farm size. Journal of Political Economy. 130(3), 636–680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/717890
    6. [6] Vicente Cateia, J., Bittencourt, M.V.L., Carvalho, T.S., et al., 2024. The impacts of agricultural productivity on structural transformation, and poverty alleviation in Africa: Evidence from Guinea-Bissau. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 61(3), 305–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-023-00703-1
    7. [7] Li, C., Luo, C., Jia, H., et al., 2025. Advancing agricultural economic growth through technology innovation and structural transformation: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 10(4), 100743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100743
    8. [8] Muhamad, G.M., 2024. The technological effects of renewable and non-renewable energy on agricultural productivity in developed countries. International Journal of Empirical Economics. 3(3), 2450008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2810943024500082
    9. [9] Ray, P.P., 2023. AI-assisted sustainable farming: Harnessing the power of ChatGPT in modern agricultural sciences and technology. ACS Agricultural Science & Technology. 3(6), 460–462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsagscitech.3c00145
    10. [10] Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E., 1991. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
    11. [11] Siregar, H., Rajagukguk, W., Sembiring, S.A., 2022. Trade openness and growth in agrarian economies. Economic Modelling. 110, 105809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105809
    12. [12] Anderson, K., Martin, W., 2005. Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda. World Economy. 28(9), 1301–1327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2005.00735.x
    13. [13] Fan, L., Aspy, N.N., Smrity, D.Y., et al., 2024. Moving towards food security in South Asian region: Assessing the role of agricultural trade openness, production and employment. Heliyon. 10(13), e33522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33522
    14. [14] Sinha, J.K., 2025. Macroeconomic shifts and structural transformation in Indian agriculture: A policy-oriented perspective. Journal of Economic Development, Innovation and Policy. 1(1), 1–18.
    15. [15] Sinha, J.K., 2025. Assessing GVA contributions, FDI impact, economic growth, and trade openness on agricultural productivity in India: An ARDL approach. Digital Journal of Science. 2(3), 1–14.
    16. [16] Sinha, J.K., 2023. Economies of the factors affecting crop production in India: Analysis based on Cobb-Douglas production function. Sumerianz Journal of Economics and Finance. 6(1), 10–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47752/sjef.61.10.18
    17. [17] Lucas Jr., R.E., 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics. 22(1), 3–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
    18. [18] Romer, P.M., 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy. 98(5), S71–S102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
    19. [19] Chavas, J.P., Nauges, C., 2020. Uncertainty, learning, and technology adoption in agriculture. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 42(1), 42–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13003
    20. [20] Gaidhani, D., Nair, N., Jadhav, S., et al., 2022. Impact of research and development on the GDP growth rate of nations: Evidence using panel data. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Business and Industrial Research (ICBIR), Bangkok, Thailand, 19–20 May 2022; pp. 232–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBIR54589.2022.9786420
    21. [21] Pastor, J.M., Peraita, C., Serrano, L., et al., 2018. Higher education institutions, economic growth and GDP per capita in European Union countries. European Planning Studies. 26(8), 1616–1637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1480707
    22. [22] Ahmadini, A.A.H., El-Saeed, A.R., Mossalem Ahmed Elshafei, A.S., 2025. Impact of public education spending on GDP in Gulf countries: A machine learning analysis. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences. 18(2), 101423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2025.101423
    23. [23] Rodrik, D., Diao, X., McMillan, M., 2019. The recent growth boom in developing economies: A structural change perspective. In: Nissanke, M., Ocampo, J.A. (Eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Development Economics. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK.
    24. [24] Fan, S., Brzeska, J., Olofinbiyi, T., 2015. The business imperative: Helping small family farmers to move up or move out. In 2014–2015 Global Food Policy Report. International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, DC, USA. pp. 25–31. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/150301
    25. [25] Kulshrestha, P., Agrawal, A., 2019. Agricultural growth and economic development in India: An inter-sectoral analysis. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 74(3), 321–335.
    26. [26] Sahu, P.K., Gartia, R., 2024. Gross value added and economic development: Evidence from Indian states. Economic Affairs. 69(1), 112–120.
    27. [27] Dracea, R., Ciobanu, L., 2019. The contribution of the agricultural sector to economic growth in Romania. Available from: https://www.cafee.ase.ro/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/THE-CONTRIBUTION-OF-THE-AGRICULTURAL-SECTOR-TO-ECONOMIC-GROWTH-IN-ROMANIA.pdf (cited 26 March 2026).
    28. [28] Novaković, T., Tomaš Simin, M., Novaković, D., et al., 2024. Analysis of the Gross Added Value of Agricultural Production in the Republic of Serbia. Economics of Agriculture. 71(4), 1383–1399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59267/ekoPolj24041383N
    29. [29] Pawlak, K., Kołodziejczak, M., 2020. The Role of Agriculture in Ensuring Food Security in Developing Countries: Considerations in the Context of the Problem of Sustainable Food Production. Sustainability. 12(13), 5488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135488
    30. [30] Shaqiri, A., 2019. Agriculture and economic development: Evidence from developing economies. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues. 9(3), 152–158.
    31. [31] Self, S., Grabowski, R., 2007. Economic development and the role of agricultural technology. Agricultural Economics. 36(3), 395–404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00215.x
    32. [32] Sinha, J.K., 2018. Technological advancement and agricultural productivity in India. Indian Economic Review. 53(2), 201–220.
    33. [33] Danda, M.K., 2022. Mechanization and agricultural growth in emerging economies. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America. 53(4), 1023–1030.
    34. [34] Sinha, J.K., 2018. Influence of technologies on the growth rate of GDP from agriculture: A case study of sustaining economic growth of the agriculture sector in Bihar. Statistical Journal of the IAOS. 35(2), 277–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-180436
    35. [35] Sinha, J.K., Sinha, A.K., 2025. Sustainable Agricultural Development under the Influence of Technology: A Case Study of Bihar. New Countryside. 4(1), 79–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55121/nc.v4i1.385
    36. [36] Sinha, J.K., 2024. Harnessing technology for sustainable agriculture: A case study from Bihar, India. Open Access Journal of Agricultural Research. 9(2), 000365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23880/oajar-16000365
    37. [37] Talaviya, T., Shah, D., Patel, N., et al., 2020. Implementation of artificial intelligence in agriculture for optimisation of irrigation and application of pesticides and herbicides. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture. 4, 58–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiia.2020.04.002
    38. [38] Soleimanipour, A., Chegini, G., 2020. A vision-based hybrid approach for identification of Anthurium flower cultivars. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 174, 105460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105460
    39. [39] Ammar, E.E., Rady, H.A., Khattab, A.M., et al., 2023. A comprehensive overview of eco-friendly bio-fertilizers extracted from living organisms. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 30(53), 113119–113137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30260-x
    40. [40] Cabanillas-Carbonell, M., Zapata-Paulini, J., 2025. Artificial intelligence applications in agriculture: A systematic review of literature. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence. 14(5), 3503–3519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v14.i5.pp3503-3519
    41. [41] Hove, M.T., Ngwenya, H., Madhazi, K., 2024. Digital advisory systems in Zimbabwean agriculture: Opportunities and constraints. Agricultural Sciences. 15(11), 1315–1339.
    42. [42] Keho, Y., 2017. The impact of trade openness on economic growth: The case of Cote d’Ivoire. Cogent Economics & Finance. 5(1), 1332820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2017.1332820
    43. [43] Otieno Jabuya, D., Sule, F.O., Ndwiga, M.J., 2023. The effect of agricultural trade openness on economic growth in the East African Community. Cogent Economics & Finance. 11(2), 2250632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2250632
    44. [44] Wise, T.A., 2009. Agricultural Dumping under NAFTA: Estimating the Costs of U.S. Agricultural Policies to Mexican Producers. AgEcon Search: Research in Agricultural & Applied Economics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.179078
    45. [45] Nam, H.J., Ryu, D., 2024. Does trade openness promote economic growth in developing countries? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. 93, 101985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2024.101985
    46. [46] Tamayo, M., Rebolledo, J., Besoaín-Saldaña, A., 2017. Monitoring inclusive education in Chile: Differences between urban and rural areas. International Journal of Educational Development. 53, 110–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.01.002
    47. [47] Artige, L., Cavenaile, L., 2023. Public education expenditures, growth and income inequality. Journal of Economic Theory. 209, 105622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2023.105622
    48. [48] Margolies, A., Colantuoni, E., Morgan, R., et al., 2023. The burdens of participation: A mixed-methods study of the effects of a nutrition-sensitive agriculture program on women’s time use in Malawi. World Development. 163, 106122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106122
    Back to top