Review

Curated Topics on Novel Exotic Eco-Friendly Materials for Sustainable Rechargeable Battery Technologies

Arvind Kasbe ORCID , Aqsa Nazir ORCID , Swetarekha Ram ORCID , Henu Sharma ORCID , Kisor K Sahu ORCID
    Received
    30 Dec 2024
    Published
    15 Apr 2025

    Abstract

    This work explores novel and eco-friendly materials that hold transformative potential in addressing the limitations of traditional rechargeable battery systems while aligning with sustainability goals. Beginning with a brief overview of global energy demand and rechargeable battery architectures, this curated study delves into four cutting-edge materials classes, each offering unique advantages. Nanocomposites for Silicon-based anodes represent a breakthrough in enhancing energy density and addressing volume expansion issues, which are the major limitations of silicon anodes. We explore the possibility of recycling silicon from photovoltaic (PV) panels and its associated Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) costs. The study then shifts focus to the realm of two-dimensional (2D) materials, highlighting their exceptional electrical, mechanical, and catalytic properties, which promise substantial improvements in (Li, Na, K-ion based) battery performance. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), with their tunable porosity and multifunctionality, are investigated for their role in polysulfide confinement and catalytic enhancement in lithium-sulfur and other battery chemistries. The next topic delves into bio-based catalysts, which have emerged as sustainable alternatives for facilitating electrochemical reactions, leveragin renewable resources to minimize environmental impact. Finally, conductive polymers are briefly considered for their ability to offer flexibility and conductivity, possibility of getting rid of inactive materials in batteries, paving the way for advanced, deformable energy storage devices. This compilation underscores the immense potential of these exotic materials in revolutionizing battery technologies, providing insights into their applications, challenges, and scalability. The discussion concludes with future perspectives on integrating these materials into commercial systems to achieve energy sustainability.

    Keywords

    Conductive Polymers, Global Energy Demand, Metal-Organic Frameworks, Nanocomposites, Novel Materials, Silicon-Based Anodes, Sustainable Practices, Two-Dimensional Materials

    References
    1. 1. Kardashev, N.S., 1964. Transmission of Information by Extraterrestrial Civilizations. Soviet Astronomy. 8, 217–221.
    2. 2. Gray, R.H., 2020. The Extended Kardashev Scale. The Astronomical Journal. 159(228), 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ab792b
    3. 3. Li, F., Song, Z., Liu, W., 2014. China’s energy consumption under the global economic crisis: Decomposition and sectoral analysis. Energy Policy. 64, 193–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.014
    4. 4. Balatsky, A., Balatsky, G., Borysov, S., 2015. Resource Demand Growth and Sustainability Due to Increased World Consumption. Sustainability. 7(3), 3430–3440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su7033430
    5. 5. Inshakov, O.V., Bogachkova, L.Y., Popkova, et al., 2019. The Transformation of the Global Energy Markets and the Problem of Ensuring the Sustainability of Their Development. In: Inshakov, O.V., Inshakova, A.O.,, Popkova, et al., (eds.). Energy Sector: A Systemic Analysis of Economy, Foreign Trade and Legal Regulations. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 135–148.
    6. 6. Gereffi, G., 2010. The Global Economy: Organization, Governance, and Development. In: Smelser, N.J., Swedberg, R. (eds.). The Handbook of Economic Sociology, 2ed. Princeton University Press: Princeton, USA. pp. 160–182.
    7. 7. Vasant Kumar, R., Sarakonsri, T., 2023. Introduction to Electrochemical Cells. In: Kumar, R., Aifantis, K., Hu, P. (eds.). Rechargeable Ion Batteries. Wiley-VCH Verlag, Germany. pp. 1–20.
    8. 8. Sharma, H., Katari, V., Sahu, K.K., Singh, A., 2024. Confluence of electronic structure calculations (DFT) and machine learning (ML) for lithium and sodium-ion batteries: a theoretical perspective. Engineering Research Express. 6(3), 032002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ad708f
    9. 9. Peljo, P., Girault, H.H., 2018. Electrochemical potential window of battery electrolytes: the HOMO–LUMO misconception. Energy & Environmental Science. 11(9), 2306–2309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EE01286E
    10. 10. Chen, P., Lin, X., Yang, B., et al., 2024. Cellulose Separators for Rechargeable Batteries with High Safety: Advantages, Strategies, and Perspectives. Advanced Functional Materials. 34(49), 2409368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202409368
    11. 11. Goodenough, J.B., 2013. Evolution of Strategies for Modern Rechargeable Batteries. Accounts of Chemical Research. 46(5), 1053–1061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ar2002705
    12. 12. Cheng, A.L., Fuchs, E.R.H., Karplus, V.J., Michalek, J.J., 2024. Electric vehicle battery chemistry affects supply chain disruption vulnerabilities. Nature Communications. 15, 2143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46418-1
    13. 13. Moon, J., Lee, H.C., Jung, H., et al., 2021. Interplay between electrochemical reactions and mechanical responses in silicon–graphite anodes and its impact on degradation. Nature Communications. 12, 2714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22662-7
    14. 14. Zhang, X., Wang, D., Qiu, X., et al., 2020. Stable high-capacity and high-rate silicon-based lithium battery anodes upon two-dimensional covalent encapsulation. Nature Communications. 11, 3826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17686-4
    15. 15. Cabello, M., Gucciardi, E., Liendo, G., et al., 2021. A Study to Explore the Suitability of LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2/Silicon@Graphite Cells for High-Power Lithium-Ion Batteries.  International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 22(19), 10331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910331
    16. 16. Wang, W., Favors, Z., Li, C., et al., 2017. Silicon and Carbon Nanocomposite Spheres with Enhanced Electrochemical Performance for Full Cell Lithium Ion Batteries. Scientific Reports. 7, 44838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44838
    17. 17. Deng, R., Chang, N.L., Ouyang, Z., Chong, C.M., 2019. A techno-economic review of silicon photovoltaic module recycling. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 109, 532–550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.020
    18. 18. Muraleedharan Pillai, M., Kalidas, N., Zhao, X., Lehto, V.-P., 2022. Biomass-Based Silicon and Carbon for Lithium-Ion Battery Anodes. Frontiers in Chemistry. 10, 882081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2022.882081
    19. 19. Majeed, M.K., Saleem, A., Wang, C., et al., 2020. Simplified Synthesis of Biomass‐Derived Si/C Composites as Stable Anode Materials for Lithium‐Ion Batteries. Chemistry – A European Journal. 26(46), 10544–10549 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202000953
    20. 20. Late, D.J., Wiemer, C., 2022. Advances in low dimensional and 2D materials. AIP Advances. 12(11), 110401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0129120
    21. 21. 2024. Phase landscapes in low-dimensional structures. Nature Materials. 23, 1301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-024-02017-5
    22. 22. Shockley, W., Queisser, H.J., 1961. Detailed Balance Limit of Efficiency of p-n Junction Solar Cells. Journal of Applied Physics. 32(3), 510–519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1736034
    23. 23. Battaglia, C., Cuevas, A., De Wolf, S., 2016. High-efficiency crystalline silicon solar cells: status and perspectives. Energy & Environmental Science. 9(5), 1552–1576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE03380B
    24. 24. Ugur, E., Said, A.A., Dally, P., et al., 2024. Enhanced cation interaction in perovskites for efficient tandem solar cells with silicon. Science. 385(6708), 533–538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adp1621
    25. 25. Aydin, E., Allen, T.G., De Bastiani, M., et al., 2024. Pathways toward commercial perovskite/silicon tandem photovoltaics. Science. 383(6679), eadh3849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh3849
    26. 26. Sohn, H., Létant, S., Sailor, M.J., Trogler, W.C., 2000. Detection of Fluorophosphonate Chemical Warfare Agents by Catalytic Hydrolysis with a Porous Silicon Interferometer. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 122(22), 5399–5400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0006200
    27. 27. Cheng, Z., Liang, J., Kawamura, K., et al., 2022. High thermal conductivity in wafer-scale cubic silicon carbide crystals. Nature Communications. 13, 7201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34943-w
    28. 28. Yamasue, E., Susa, M., Fukuyama, H., et al., 2022. Thermal conductivities of silicon and germanium in solid and liquid states measured by non-stationary hot wire method with silica coated probe. Journal of Crystal Growth. 234(1), 121–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(01)01673-6
    29. 29. Yamaoka, S., Diamantopoulos, N.-P., Nishi, H., et al., 2021. Directly modulated membrane lasers with 108 GHz bandwidth on a high-thermal-conductivity silicon carbide substrate. Nature Photonics. 15, 28–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-020-00700-y
    30. 30. Jayasheel Kumar, K.A., Ramesha, C.M., Srinath, M.K., et al.,2022. Fabrication and post processing techniques to enhance the strength of Al-Si alloy. Materials Today: Proceedings. 59, 483–488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.470
    31. 31. Eric, R.H., 2014. Production of Ferroalloys. In: Seetharaman, S. (eds.). Treatise on Process Metallurgy. Elsevier: Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp. 477–532.
    32. 32. Choi, M., Lee, E., Sung, J., et al., 2024. Comparison of commercial silicon-based anode materials for the design of a high-energy lithium-ion battery. Nano Research. 17, 5270–5277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-024-6512-x
    33. 33. Rehman, W.U., Wang, H., Manj, R.Z.A., et al., 2021. When Silicon Materials Meet Natural Sources: Opportunities and Challenges for Low‐Cost Lithium Storage. Small. 17(9), 1904508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201904508
    34. 34. Nazir, A., Le, H.T.T., Kasbe, A., et al., 2021. Si nanoparticles confined within a conductive 2D porous Cu-based metal–organic framework (Cu3(HITP)2) as potential anodes for high-capacity Li-ion batteries. Chemical Engineering Journal. 405, 126963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126963
    35. 35. Tareq, F.K., Rudra, S., 2024. Enhancing the performance of silicon-based anode materials for alkali metal (Li, Na, K) ion battery: A review on advanced strategies. Materials Today Communications. 39, 108653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.108653
    36. 36. Wang, F., Zhai, Z., Zhao, Z., et al., 2024. Physics-informed neural network for lithium-ion battery degradation stable modeling and prognosis. Nature Communications. 15, 4332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48779-z
    37. 37. Deng, H., Aifantis, K.E., 2023. Applications of Lithium Batteries. In: Kumar, R., Aifantis, K., Hu, P. (eds.). Rechargeable Ion Batteries. Wiley: Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany. pp. 83–103.
    38. 38. Nitta, N., Wu, F., Lee, J.T., et al., 2015. Li-ion battery materials: present and future. Materials Today. 18(5), 252–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040
    39. 39. Global battery alliance. (2019), A Vision for a Sustainable Battery Value Chain in 2030. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_A_Vision_for_a_Sustainable_Battery_Value_Chain_in_2030_Report.pdf
    40. 40. Vera, M.L., Torres, W.R., Galli, C.I., et al., 2023. Environmental impact of direct lithium extraction from brines. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 4, 149–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00387-5
    41. 41. Tao, Y., Rahn, C.D., Archer, L.A., et al., 2021. Second life and recycling: Energy and environmental sustainability perspectives for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Science Advances. 7(45), eabi7633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abi7633
    42. 42. Chamidah, N., Suzuki, A., Shimizu, T., et al., 2023. Kinetic analysis of silicon–lithium alloying reaction in silicon single crystal using soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy. RSC Advances. 13(25), 17114–17120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA02554C
    43. 43. Iwamura, S., Nishihara, H., Ono, Y., et al., 2015. Li-Rich Li-Si Alloy As A Lithium-Containing Negative Electrode Material Towards High Energy Lithium-Ion Batteries. Scientific Reports. 5, 8085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08085
    44. 44. Li, H., Yamaguchi, T., Matsumoto, S., et al., 2020. Circumventing huge volume strain in alloy anodes of lithium batteries. Nature Communications 11, 1584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15452-0
    45. 45. Yu, Y., Gong, H., He, X., et al., 2024. Alleviating the volume expansion of silicon anodes by constructing a high-strength ordered multidimensional encapsulation structure. Chemical Science. 15(38), 15891–15899 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SC04751F
    46. 46. Ashuri, M., He, Q., Shaw, L.L., 2016. Silicon as a potential anode material for Li-ion batteries: where size, geometry and structure matter. Nanoscale. 8(1), 74–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR05116A
    47. 47. Khan, M., Yan, S., Ali, M., et al., 2024. Innovative Solutions for High-Performance Silicon Anodes in Lithium-Ion Batteries: Overcoming Challenges and Real-World Applications. Nano-Micro Letters. 16, 179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-024-01388-3
    48. 48. Min, C., Nazir, A., Le, H.T.T., et al., 2022. Facile Fabrication of Highly Porous 3D Sponge‐Like Si@C Composites as High‐Performance Anode Materials for Lithium‐Ion Batteries. Batteries & Supercaps. 5(5), e202100403. https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.202100403
    49. 49. Pathak, A.D., Chanda, U.K., Samanta, K., et al., 2019. Selective leaching of Al from hypereutectic Al-Si alloy to produce nano-porous silicon (NPS) anodes for lithium ion batteries. Electrochimica Acta. 317, 654–662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.06.040
    50. 50. Wu, J., Cao, Y., Zhao, H., et al., 2019. The critical role of carbon in marrying silicon and graphite anodes for high‐energy lithium‐ion batteries. Carbon Energy. 1(1), 57–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cey2.2
    51. 51. Wang, W., Yang, S., 2017. Enhanced overall electrochemical performance of silicon/carbon anode for lithium-ion batteries using fluoroethylene carbonate as an electrolyte additive. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 695, 3249–3255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.248
    52. 52. Eshetu, G.G., Zhang, H., Judez, X., et al., 2021. Production of high-energy Li-ion batteries comprising silicon-containing anodes and insertion-type cathodes. Nature Communications. 12, 5459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25334-8
    53. 53. IRENA, 2016. END-OF-LIFE MANAGEMENT: Solar Photovoltaic Panels. IEA-PVPS Report Number: T12-06:2016, June 2016
    54. 54. Roser, M., 2020. Why did renewables become so cheap so fast? Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/cheap-renewables-growth' , 1st December 2020.
    55. 55. Luo, F., Lyu, T., Wang, D., et al., 2023. A review on green and sustainable carbon anodes for lithium ion batteries: utilization of green carbon resources and recycling waste graphite. Green Chemistry. 25(22), 8950–8969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D3GC03078D
    56. 56. Gao, S., Chen, X., Qu, J., et al., 2024. Recycling of silicon solar panels through a salt-etching approach. Nature Sustainability. 7, 920–930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01360-4
    57. 57. Kim, S.K., Kim, H., Chang, H., et al., 2016. One-Step Formation of Silicon-Graphene Composites from Silicon Sludge Waste and Graphene Oxide via Aerosol Process for Lithium Ion Batteries. Scientific Reports. 6, 33688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33688
    58. 58. Huang, T.-Y., Selvaraj, B., Lin, H.-Y., et al., 2016. Exploring an interesting si source from photovoltaic industry waste and engineering It as a Li-Ion Battery High-Capacity Anode. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 4(10), 5769–5775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01749
    59. 59. Ma, Q., Qu, J., Chen, X., et al., 2020. Converting micro-sized kerf-loss silicon waste to high-performance hollow-structured silicon/carbon composite anodes for lithium-ion batteries. Sustainable Energy & Fuels. 4(9), 4780–4788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SE00831A
    60. 60. Yuan, Y., Wan, J., Zhao, Z., et al., 2024. ZIF-90 derived carbon-coated kerf-loss silicon for enhanced lithium storage. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 970, 172429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.172429
    61. 61. Ji, H., Xu, X., Li, X., et al., 2024. A low-cost Si@C composite for lithium-ion batteries anode materials synthesized via freeze-drying process using kerf loss Si waste. Ionics. 30(5), 2585–2599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-024-05485-6
    62. 62. Kanaphan, Y., Klamchuen, A., Piyavarakorn, V., et al., 2023. Multilayer Silicene nanosheets derived from a recycling process using end-of-life solar cells producing a silicene/graphite composite for anodes in lithium-ion batteries. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 11(37), 13545–13553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c02027
    63. 63. Eshraghi, N., Berardo, L., Schrijnemakers, A., et al., 2020. Recovery of nano-structured silicon from end-of-life photovoltaic wafers with value-added applications in lithium-Ion Battery. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 8(15), 5868–5879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b07434
    64. 64. Qiu, J., Zhu, C., Ge, B., et al., 2025. Manufacturing lithium-ion anodes from silicon recovered from end-of-life solar panels. Applied Surface Science. 682, 161605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.161605
    65. 65. Granata, G., Pagnanelli, F., Moscardini, E., et al., 2014. Recycling of photovoltaic panels by physical operations. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 123, 239–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2014.01.012
    66. 66. Wang, O., Chen, Z., Ma, X., 2024. Advancing sustainable end-of-life strategies for photovoltaic modules with silicon reclamation for lithium-ion battery anodes. Green Chemistry. 26(7), 3688–3697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D4GC00357H
    67. 67. Tao, M., Fthenakis, V., Ebin, B., et al., 2020. Major challenges and opportunities in silicon solar module recycling. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications. 28(10), 1077–1088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3316
    68. 68. Huang, S., et al., 2022. Solar Energy Technologies Office Photovoltaics End-of-Life Action Plan. Available from: https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2022-03/Solar-Energy-Technologies-Office-PV-End-of-Life-Action-Plan_0.pdf (2 March 2022).
    69. 69. Latunussa, C.E.L., Ardente, F., Blengini, G.A., Mancini, L., 2016. Life Cycle Assessment of an innovative recycling process for crystalline silicon photovoltaic panels. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 156, 101–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.03.020
    70. 70. Dias, P., Schmidt, L., Monteiro Lunardi, M., et al., 2021. Comprehensive recycling of silicon photovoltaic modules incorporating organic solvent delamination – technical, environmental and economic analyses. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 165, 105241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105241
    71. 71. Kordi, M., Farrokhi, N., Pech-Canul, M.I., Ahmadikhah, A., 2024. Rice Husk at a Glance: From Agro-Industrial to Modern Applications. Rice Science. 31(1), 14–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2023.08.005
    72. 72. Sun, L., Gong, K., 2001. Silicon-Based Materials from Rice Husks and Their Applications. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 40(25), 5861–5877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ie010284b
    73. 73. Nzereogu, P.U., Omah, A.D., Ezema, F.I., et al., 2023. Silica extraction from rice husk: Comprehensive review and applications. Hybrid Advances. 4, 100111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hybadv.2023.100111
    74. 74. Hossain, S.S., Mathur, L., Roy, P.K., 2018. Rice husk/rice husk ash as an alternative source of silica in ceramics: A review. Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies. 6(4), 299–313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21870764.2018.1539210
    75. 75. Shen, Y., 2017. Rice Husk Silica-Derived Nanomaterials for Battery Applications: A Literature Review. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 65(5), 995–1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b04777
    76. 76. Nazir, A., Le, H.T.T., Min, C.-W., et al., 2020. Coupling of a conductive Ni3 (2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene)2 metal–organic framework with silicon nanoparticles for use in high-capacity lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale. 12(3), 1629–1642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR08038D
    77. 77. Bao, Z., Weatherspoon, M.R., Shian, S., et al., 2007. Chemical reduction of three-dimensional silica micro-assemblies into microporous silicon replicas. Nature. 446, 172–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05570
    78. 78. Cai, M., Zhao, Z., Qu, J., et al., 2021. Zincothermic reduction of silica to silicon: make the impossible possible. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 9(37), 21323–21331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA06073B
    79. 79. Autthawong, T., Yodbunork, C., Yodying, W., et al., 2022. Fast-Charging Anode Materials and Novel Nanocomposite Design of Rice Husk-Derived SiO2 and Sn Nanoparticles Self-Assembled on TiO2 (B) Nanorods for Lithium-Ion Storage Applications. ACS Omega. 7(1), 1357–1367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c05982
    80. 80. Liu, N., Huo, K., McDowell, M.T., et al., 2013. Rice husks as a sustainable source of nanostructured silicon for high performance Li-ion battery anodes. Scientific Reports. 3, 1919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01919
    81. 81. Cui, J., Cheng, F., Lin, J., et al., 2017. High surface area C/SiO2 composites from rice husks as a high-performance anode for lithium ion batteries. Powder Technology. 311, 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.01.083
    82. 82. Zhang, Y.-C., You, Y., Xin, S., et al., 2016. Rice husk-derived hierarchical silicon/nitrogen-doped carbon/carbon nanotube spheres as low-cost and high-capacity anodes for lithium-ion batteries. Nano Energy. 25, 120–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.043
    83. 83. Zhang, C., Cai, X., Chen, W., et al., 2018. 3D Porous Silicon/N-Doped Carbon Composite Derived from Bamboo Charcoal as High-Performance Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 6(8), 9930–9939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01189
    84. 84. Guo, X., Zhang, Y.-Z., Zhang, F., et al., 2019. A novel strategy for the synthesis of highly stable ternary SiOx composites for Li-ion-battery anodes. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 7(26), 15969–15974 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA04062E
    85. 85. Das, S., Pegu, H., Sahu, K.K., et al., 2020. Machine learning in materials modeling—fundamentals and the opportunities in 2D materials. In: Yang, E-H., Datta, D., Ding, J., et al. (eds.). Synthesis, Modeling, and Characterization of 2D Materials, and Their Heterostructures. Elsevier: Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp. 445–468.
    86. 86. Nazir, A., Le, H.T.T., Nguyen, A.-G., et al., 2021. Graphene analogue metal organic framework with superior capacity and rate capability as an anode for lithium ion batteries. Electrochimica Acta. 389, 138750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138750
    87. 87. Saxena, S., Johnson, M., Dixit, F., et al., 2023.Thinking green with 2-D and 3-D MXenes: Environment friendly synthesis and industrial scale applications and global impact. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 178, 113238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113238
    88. 88. Xia, F., Kwon, S., Lee, W.W., et al., 2015. Graphene as an Interfacial Layer for Improving Cycling Performance of Si Nanowires in Lithium-Ion Batteries. Nano Letters. 15(10), 6658–6664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02482
    89. 89. Ki, H.-S., Nazir, A., Le, H.T.T., et al., 2024. Nitrogen-doped carbon with antimony nanoparticles as a stable anode for potassium-ion batteries. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 988, 174161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.174161
    90. 90. Fang, R., Chen, K., Yin, L., et al., 2019. The Regulating Role of Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene in Lithium‐Ion and Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Advanced Materials. 31(9), 1800863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201800863
    91. 91. Zhang, Q., Huang, N., Huang, Z., et al., 2020. CNTs@S composite as cathode for all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries with ultralong cycle life.Journal of Energy Chemistry. 40, 151–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2019.03.006
    92. 92. Nazir, A., Pathak, A., Hamal, D., et al., 2025. Targeted Electrocatalysis for High‐Performance Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS. 8(2), e12844. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.12844
    93. 93. Sharma, H., Nazir, A., Kasbe, A., et al., 2023. Computational materials discovery and development for Li and non-Li advanced battery chemistries: Review paper.  Journal of Electrochemical Science and Engineering. 13(6), 839–879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5599/jese.1713
    94. 94. Yuan, W., Zhang, Y., Cheng, L., et al., 2016. The applications of carbon nanotubes and graphene in advanced rechargeable lithium batteries. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 4(23), 8932–8951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA01546H
    95. 95. Askari, M.B., Salarizadeh, P., Veisi, P., et al., 2023. Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides in Electrochemical Batteries and Solar Cells. Micromachines. 14(3), 691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14030691
    96. 96. Rai, A., 2019. Functionality enhancement of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide-based transistors (PhD Dissertation). Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin. pp. 174.
    97. 97. Zhao, L., Wang, Y., Wei, C., et al., 2024. MoS2-based anode materials for lithium-ion batteries: Developments and perspectives. Particuology. 87, 240–270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2023.08.009
    98. 98. Pervez, S.A., Madinehei, M., Moghimian, N., 2022. Graphene in Solid-State Batteries: An Overview. Nanomaterials. 12(13), 2310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12132310
    99. 99. Lim, J.H., Kim, K., Kang, J.H., et al., 2024. Tailored Two‐Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides for Water Electrolysis: Doping, Defect, Phase, and Heterostructure. ChemElectroChem. 11(10), e202300614 (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202300614
    100. 100. Rojaee, R., Shahbazian-Yassar, R., 2020. Two-Dimensional Materials to Address the Lithium Battery Challenges. ACS Nano. 14(3), 2628–2658. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b08396
    101. 101. Lacey, S.D., Kirsch, D.J., Li, Y., et al., 2018. Extrusion‐Based 3D Printing of 174Hierarchically Porous Advanced Battery Electrodes. Advanced Materials. 30(12), 1705651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201705651
    102. 102. Fu, K., Yao, Y., Dai, J., Hu, L., 2016. Progress in 3D Printing of Carbon Materials for Energy‐Related Applications. Advanced Materials. 29(9), 1603486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201603486
    103. 103. Nazir, A., Le, H.T.T., Nguyen, A.-G., et al., 2022. Conductive metal organic framework mediated Sb nanoparticles as high-capacity anodes for rechargeable potassium-ion batteries. Chemical Engineering Journal. 450, 138408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.138408
    104. 104. Rasheed, T., Anwar, M.T., 2023. Metal organic frameworks as self-sacrificing modalities for potential environmental catalysis and energy applications: Challenges and perspectives. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 480, 215011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2022.215011
    105. 105. Moutanassim, L., Aqil, M., Chari, A., et al., 2024. Disordered and defective semi-crystalline Fe-MOF as a high-power and high-energy anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Energy Storage. 93, 112055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.112055
    106. 106. Choi, D., Lim, S., Han, D., 2021. Advanced metal–organic frameworks for aqueous sodium-ion rechargeable batteries. Journal of Energy Chemistry. 53, 396–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.07.024
    107. 107. Jiang, Y., Zhao, H., Yue, L., et al., 2021. Recent advances in lithium-based batteries using metal organic frameworks as electrode materials. Electrochemistry Communications. 122, 106881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2020.106881
    108. 108. Xu, J., Peng, Y., Xing, W., et al., 2022. Metal-organic frameworks marry carbon: Booster for electrochemical energy storage. Journal of Energy Storage. 53, 105104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.105104
    109. 109. Zhou, J., Reddy, R.C.K., Zhong, A., et al., 2024. Metal–Organic Framework‐Based Materials for Advanced Sodium Storage: Development and Anticipation. Advanced Materials. 36(16), 2312471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202312471
    110. 110. Baumann, A.E., Burns, D.A., Liu, B., Thoi, V.S., 2019. Metal-organic framework functionalization and design strategies for advanced electrochemical energy storage devices. Communications Chemistry. 2, 86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-019-0184-6
    111. 111. Lee, J., Choi, I., Kim, E., et al., 2024. Metal-organic frameworks for high-performance cathodes in batteries. iScience. 27(7), 110211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.110211
    112. 112. Hou, Y., Zhu, C., Ban, G., et al., 2024. Advancements and Challenges in the Application of Metal-Organic Framework (MOF) Nanocomposites for Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment.  International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2024(19), 6295–6317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S463144
    113. 113. Wang, S., Huang, F., Zhang, Z., et al., 2021. Conductive metal-organic frameworks promoting polysulfides transformation in lithium-sulfur batteries. Journal of Energy Chemistry. 63, 336–343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2021.08.037
    114. 114. Shrivastav, V., Mansi, Gupta, B., et al., 2023. Recent advances on surface mounted metal-organic frameworks for energy storage and conversion applications: Trends, challenges, and opportunities. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 318, 102967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2023.102967
    115. 115. Xu, G., Nie, P., Dou, H., et al., 2017. Exploring metal organic frameworks for energy storage in batteries and supercapacitors. Materials Today. 20(4), 191–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2016.10.003
    116. 116. Chui, S.S.-Y., Lo, S.M.-F., Charmant, J.P.H., et al., 1999. A Chemically Functionalizable Nanoporous Material [Cu3 (TMA)2 (H2 O)3 ]n . Science. 283(5405), 1148–1150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5405.1148
    117. 117. Li, S., Fan, Z., 2021. Encapsulation methods of sulfur particles for lithium-sulfur batteries: A review. Energy Storage Materials. 34, 107–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.09.005
    118. 118. Hu, X., Huang, T., Zhang, G., et al., 2023. Metal-organic framework-based catalysts for lithium-sulfur batteries. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 475, 214879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214879
    119. 119. Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Tang, Y., et al., 2022. Recent advances and challenges of metal–organic framework/graphene-based composites. Composites Part B: Engineering. 230, 109532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109532
    120. 120. Zhu, R., Jiang, Y., Sun, B., et al., 2024. MOF-derived Co–Mo bimetallic heterostructures for the selective trapping and conversion of polysulfides in lithium–sulfur batteries. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers. 11(23), 8290–8299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D4QI01249F
    121. 121. Mamidi, S., Na, D., Yoon, B., et al., 2024. Safe and stable Li–CO2 battery with metal-organic framework derived cathode composite and solid electrolyte. Journal of Power Sources. 591, 233867. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233867
    122. 122. Chen, S., Zhang, Z., Wang, J., Dong, P., 2023. A Bimetallic Organic Framework with Mn in MIL-101(Cr) for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Materials. 16(10), 3794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16103794
    123. 123. Chaudhary, M.L., Patel, R., Maley, N., Gupta, R.K., 2024. Rechargeable Li-S Batteries Using Bio-Based Carbon. In: Gupta, R.K. (eds.). ACS Symposium Series. American Chemical Society: Washington, DC., USA. pp. 91–120.
    124. 124. Mandić, V., Bafti, A., Panžić, I., Radovanović-Perić, F., 2024. Bio-Based Aerogels in Energy Storage Systems. Gels. 10(7), 438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/gels10070438
    125. 125. Arkasalerks, P., Patra, A., Patnaik, K.S., et al., 2024. CoFe2 O4 Nanoparticles on Bio-Based Polymer Derived Nitrogen Doped Carbon as Bifunctional Electrocatalyst for Li-Air Battery. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. 171(8), 080538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ad69c9
    126. 126. Subhani, T., Khademolqorani, S., Banitaba, S.N., et al., 2024. Advancements in Battery Materials: Bio-Based and Mineral Fillers for Next-Generation Solid Polymer Electrolytes. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 16(46), 63089–63108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c11214
    127. 127. Xia, Y., Wang, L., Li, X., et al., 2024. Biomass‐based functional separators for rechargeable batteries. Battery Energy. 3(5), 20240015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bte2.20240015
    128. 128. Tan, L., Sun, Y., Wei, C., et al., 2021. Design of Robust, Lithiophilic, and Flexible Inorganic‐Polymer Protective Layer by Separator Engineering Enables Dendrite‐Free Lithium Metal Batteries with LiNi0.8 Mn0.1 Co0.1 O2 Cathode. Small. 17(13), 2007717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202007717
    129. 129. Wang, L., Wang, Y., Yang, J., et al., 2024. An eco-friendly and flame-retardant bio-based fibers separator with fast lithium-ion transport towards high-safety lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Power Sources. 613, 234950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234950
    130. 130. Kim, P.J., Pol, V.G., 2018. High Performance Lithium Metal Batteries Enabled by Surface Tailoring of Polypropylene Separator with a Polydopamine/Graphene Layer. Advanced Energy Materials. 8(36), 1802665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201802665
    131. 131. Lüken, A., Geiger, M., Steinbeck, et al., 2021. Biocompatible Micron‐Scale Silk Fibers Fabricated by Microfluidic Wet Spinning. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 10(20), 2100898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202100898
    132. 132. Rahman, M.M., Mateti, S., Cai, Q., et al., 2019. High temperature and high rate lithium-ion batteries with boron nitride nanotubes coated polypropylene separators. Energy Storage Materials. 19, 352–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.03.027
    133. 133. Jiao, Z., Hu, J., Ma, M., et al., 2023. Research progress of cellulose-derived carbon-based composites for microwave absorption.   Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics. 34, 536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-022-09811-4
    134. 134. Wu, Y., Gao, X., Nguyen, T.T., et al., 2022. Green and Low-Cost Natural Lignocellulosic Biomass-Based Carbon Fibers—Processing, Properties, and Applications in Sports Equipment: A Review. Polymers. 14(13), 2591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132591
    135. 135. Ahmed, N., Naeem, M.A., Rehman, A.U., et al., 2021. High Aspect Ratio Thin-Walled Structures in D2 Steel through Wire Electric Discharge Machining (EDM). Micromachines. 12(1), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12010001
    136. 136. Shen, Y., Zhang, G., Wang, R., et al., 2022. Waste Lithium Ion Battery Evolves into Heteroatom Doped Carbon as Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalyst for Aqueous Al‐Air Batteries. ChemPlusChem. 87(12)f, e202200328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cplu.202200328
    137. 137. Murugesan, C., Senthilkumar, B., Barpanda, P., 2022. Biowaste-Derived Highly Porous N-Doped Carbon as a Low-Cost Bifunctional Electrocatalyst for Hybrid Sodium–Air Batteries. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering.10(28), 9077–9086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c01300
    138. 138. Dobryden, I., Montanari, C., Bhattacharjya, D., et al., 2023. Bio-Based Binder Development for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Materials. 16(16), 5553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16165553
    139. 139. K, N., Rout, C.S., 2021. Conducting polymers: a comprehensive review on recent advances in synthesis, properties and applications. RSC Advances. 11(10), 5659–5697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA07800J
    140. 140. Heeger, A.J., 2001. Semiconducting and Metallic Polymers: The Fourth Generation of Polymeric Materials. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 105(36), 8475–8491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jp011611w
    141. 141. Mecerreyes, D., Casado, N., Villaluenga, I., Forsyth, M., 2024. Current Trends and Perspectives of Polymers in Batteries. Macromolecules. 57(7), 3013–3025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.3c01971
    142. 142. Del Olmo, R., Guzmán‐González, G., Santos‐Mendoza, I.O., et al., 2023. Unraveling the Influence of Li+ ‐cation and TFSI− ‐anion in Poly(ionic liquid) Binders for Lithium‐Metal Batteries. Batteries & Supercaps. 6(3), e202200519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.202200519
    143. 143. Abdelhamid, M.E., O’Mullane, A.P., Snook, G.A., 2015. Storing energy in plastics: a review on conducting polymers & their role in electrochemical energy storage. RSC Advances. 5(15), 11611–11626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA15947K
    144. 144. Goujon, N., Aldalur, I., Santiago, A., et al., 2024. Opportunity for lithium-ion conducting polymer electrolytes beyond polyethers. Electrochimica Acta. 480, 143909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2024.143909
    145. 145. Yang, J., Yang, J., Xu, Y., Li, Y., 2024. Towards Ultrahigh Capacity and High Cycling Stability Lithium-Conducting Polymer Batteries by In Situ Construction of Nanostructured Porous Cathodes. CCS Chemistry. 6(3), 749–760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31635/ccschem.023.202302773
    146. 146. Hu, X., Zhu, X., Ran, Z., et al., 2024. Conductive Polymer-Based Interlayers in Restraining the Polysulfide Shuttle of Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Molecules. 29(5), 1164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29051164
    147. 147. Masood, M., Hussain, S., Sohail, M., et al., 2024. Recent Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities of Conducting Polymers for Energy Storage Applications. ChemistrySelect. 9(23), e202302876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202302876
    Back to top