Article

Designing Cosmic Inhabiting: Amerindian Cosmologies, Flat Ontology, and Alternative Futures in the Anthropocene

Leonardo Marques Kussler ORCID
    Received: 17 April 2026 | Revised: 13 June 2026 | Accepted: 20 June 2026 | Published Online: 27 June 2026

    Abstract

    The environmental challenges of the Anthropocene demand alternative ways of inhabiting and relating to the world. This article introduces the concept of cosmic inhabiting as a framework for rethinking human and more-than-human coexistence through a dialogue between Amerindian perspectivism and flat ontology. Through a conceptual and comparative theoretical analysis, it investigates convergences between these traditions and explores their implications for environmentally responsible futures. The first part examines key dimensions of Amerindian perspectivism, particularly in the work of Eduardo Viveiros de Castro and Indigenous thinkers such as Ailton Krenak, highlighting forms of reciprocity, care, and co-responsibility that challenge anthropocentric assumptions. The second part analyzes how flat ontology, especially in Graham Harman’s object-oriented thought and related relational approaches, similarly questions ontological hierarchies that privilege human beings over other entities. Drawing on recent debates in design anthropology, ontological design, and pluriversal design, the article argues that cosmic inhabiting provides a conceptual bridge between these perspectives and offers resources for imagining alternative futures beyond extractivism and anthropocentrism. By bringing these traditions into dialogue, the article contributes to contemporary discussions on design, ecology, and environmental responsibility in the Anthropocene.

    Keywords

    Anthropocene, Design Anthropology, Pluriverse, Amerindian Perspectivism, Cosmic Inhabiting, Ontological Design

    References
    1. [1] Escobar, A., 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371816
    2. [2] Ingold, T., 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. Routledge: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203559055
    3. [3] Fry, T., 2009. Design Futuring: Sustainability, Ethics and New Practice. Berg: Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA.
    4. [4] Otto, T., Smith, R.C., Vangkilde, K.T. (Eds.), 2013. Design Anthropology: Theory and Practice. Bloomsbury Academic: London, UK.
    5. [5] Gunn, W., Donovan, J., Otto, T. (Eds.), 2022. The Routledge Companion to Design Anthropology. Routledge: London, UK.
    6. [6] Ingold, T., 2022. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. Routledge: London, UK.
    7. [7] Gadamer, H.-G., 2013. Truth and Method. Bloomsbury: London, UK.
    8. [8] Viveiros de Castro, E., 1996. Cosmological pronouns and Amerindian perspectivism. Mana. 2(2), 115–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-93131996000200005 (in Portuguese)
    9. [9] Viveiros de Castro, E., 1998. Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 4(3), 469–488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3034157
    10. [10] Viveiros de Castro, E., 2014. Cannibal Metaphysics: For a Post-Structural Anthropology. Skafish, P. (Trans.). Univocal: Minneapolis, MN, USA.
    11. [11] Haraway, D.J., 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q
    12. [12] Escobar, A., Osterweil, M., Sharma, K., 2024. Relationality: An Emergent Politics of Life beyond the Human. Bloomsbury Academic: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350226005
    13. [13] de la Cadena, M., 2015. Earth Beings: Ecologies of Practice across Andean Worlds. Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA.
    14. [14] Heidegger, M., 2010. Being and Time. Stambaugh, J. (Trans.). State University of New York Press: Albany, NY, USA.
    15. [15] Lima, T.S., 2000. Towards an ethnographic theory of the nature/culture distinction in Juruna cosmology. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais. 14(40), 43–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69092000000500004
    16. [16] Limulja, H., 2022. Notes on Yanomami dreams. Revista de Antropologia. 65(3), e197980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/1678-9857.ra.2022.197980
    17. [17] Krenak, A., 2020. Ideas to Postpone the End of the World. Doyle, A. (Trans.). House of Anansi Press: Toronto, ON, Canada.
    18. [18] Krenak, A., 2024. Ancestral Future. Brostoff, A., Dias, J.P. (Eds.). Polity Press: Cambridge, UK.
    19. [19] Krenak, A., 2023. Life Is Not Useful. Dias, J.P.D., Brostoff, A. (Eds.). Polity Press: Cambridge, UK.
    20. [20] Taylor, C., 2024. Cosmic Connections: Poetry in the Age of Disenchantment. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674297074
    21. [21] Harman, G., 2011. The Quadruple Object. Zer0 Books: Winchester, UK.
    22. [22] Latour, B., 1994. On technical mediation: Philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common Knowledge. 3(2), 29–64. Available from: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/54-TECHNIQUES-GB.pdf
    23. [23] DeLanda, M., 2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. Bloomsbury Academic: New York, NY, USA.
    24. [24] Harman, G., 2017. Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. Pelican Books: London, UK.
    25. [25] Heidegger, M., 1977. The question concerning technology. In: Lovitt, W. (Ed.). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Garland Publishing: New York, NY, USA; London, UK. pp. 3–35.
    26. [26] Pevsner, N., 1960. Pioneers of Modern Design: From William Morris to Walter Gropius. Penguin Books: Harmondsworth, UK.
    27. [27] Dunne, A., Raby, F., 2013. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
    28. [28] Verbeek, P.P., 2008. Morality in design: Design ethics and the morality of technological artifacts. In: Vermaas, P.E., Kroes, P., Light, A., et al. (Eds.). Philosophy and Design: From Engineering to Architecture. Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands. pp. 91–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6591-0_7
    29. [29] Willis, A.M., 2006. Ontological designing. Design Philosophy Papers. 4(2), 69–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/144871306X13966268131514
    30. [30] Kussler, L.M., 2023. Between art, philosophy of design and philosophical-hermeneutical design. Unisinos Philosophy Journal. 24(2), 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2023.242.09 (in Portuguese)
    31. [31] Kussler, L.M., Beccari, M.N., 2026. Designing disobedient forms of life. In: Secomandi, F.C., Verbeek, P.-P. (Eds.). Design Philosophy after the Technology Turn. Bloomsbury Visual Arts: London, UK. pp. 157–174.
    32. [32] Tonkinwise, C., 2022. Before design, more-than-design: Elucidating “ontological design”. Design Culture. 14(3), 341–359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2022.2105529
    33. [33] Fry, T., Dilnot, C., Stewart, S. (Eds.), 2023. Design and the Question of History. Bloomsbury Visual Arts: London, UK.
    34. [34] Fry, T., 2025. Political Breakout: Situation, Need, Action. Vernon Press: Wilmington, DE, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54094/b-f434ca3250
    35. [35] McHarg, I.L., 1969. Design with Nature. Natural History Press: Garden City, NJ, USA.
    36. [36] McHarg, I.L., 2006. Ecology and design. In: Steiner, F.R. (Ed.). The Essential Ian McHarg: Writings on Design and Nature. Island Press: Washington, DC, USA. p. 122.
    37. [37] Fry, T., 2020. Defuturing: A New Design Philosophy, 2nd ed. Bloomsbury Visual Arts: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350089563
    38. [38] Papanek, V., 1985. Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change, 2nd ed. Thames & Hudson: London, UK.
    39. [39] Fry, T., 2019. Starting at the end: A journey in time. In: Candy, S., Potter, C. (Eds.). Design and Futures. Tamkang University Press: Taipei, Taiwan. pp. 159–163.
    40. [40] Fry, T., Willis, A.-M., 2015. Steel: A Design, Cultural and Ecological History. Bloomsbury Academic: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474248969
    41. [41] Saito, K., 2024. Slow Down: The Degrowth Manifesto. Bergstrom, B. (Trans.). Astra House: New York, NY, USA.
    42. [42] Tsing, A.L., 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400873548
    43. [43] van Dooren, T., 2022. A World in a Shell: Snail Stories for a Time of Extinctions. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14579.001.0001
    Back to top